Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
33. I think that anytime someone doesn't immediately protect himself, and takes time
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 09:17 PM
Jun 2012

to look for a window to crawl out of, or whatever, he is risking losing his life.

I think the law is intended simply to prevent laws that required people to take other actions before defending themselves, and in the course of things, run risking their lives even more.

SYG is for when someone comes onto YOUR territory or in YOUR face with the intent to harm or kill you.

Example: If I'm in bed, middle of night, I hear someone breaking in. I know why they're there, of course. I get my gun. So, do I have to break a window and try to get out, alerting the home invader of where I am, in order to avoid being prosecuted for shooting the guy when he comes through my bedroom door? I am required to leave my pets behind and all my belongings, and surrender my home, and risk being caught while trying to climb out of a window?

Now, I might choose to do that, anyway. I have that right. But SYG also gives me the right to stay put and wait and see if he comes through my bedroom door, to me and my pets. I can hide under my bed, if I want. But if he comes through the door, I'll shoot to kill. That's because I know why he's there. He made that clear when he broke into my house in the middle of the night.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Your post clearly indicates you have *ZERO* knowledge of 'stand your ground'. Edweird Jun 2012 #1
Um no... Kalidurga Jun 2012 #2
Sir, there are some holes in your interpretation Meiko Jun 2012 #3
It's worse than that - it's legalized murder. baldguy Jun 2012 #4
There are some pretty strong messages here for Meiko Jun 2012 #5
One can plan the perfect crime of murder. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #6
You don't need SYG to do that. hack89 Jun 2012 #8
The problem is that safeinOhio Jun 2012 #9
Prosecutors routinely refuse to indict for self defense shootings hack89 Jun 2012 #10
They can't if they don't investigate the killing of safeinOhio Jun 2012 #11
So it is all about race? hack89 Jun 2012 #12
There are those that want to see it turned into a racial issue Meiko Jun 2012 #14
It's very effective for ending any real discussion hack89 Jun 2012 #15
Starting to look a lot like it. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #16
Considering the racists roots of gun control laws in the first place hack89 Jun 2012 #17
Minorities of the large major cities safeinOhio Jun 2012 #19
Unfortunately for them hack89 Jun 2012 #20
I'm sure you and others always safeinOhio Jun 2012 #23
So voters can vote away people's consitutional rights? They can vote to ban abortion? hack89 Jun 2012 #24
Unconstitutional according to who? Scalia? DanTex Jun 2012 #25
I agree with Heller. None of the others. nt hack89 Jun 2012 #26
Most agree Heller, in that the court held safeinOhio Jun 2012 #27
There will be more court cases hack89 Jun 2012 #29
But, you said you agree with Heller. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #31
As a good first step hack89 Jun 2012 #32
If the Scalia court did not attempt to overturn Rove v Wade hack89 Jun 2012 #34
Read the minority response to the courts decision. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #35
You are willfully misreading the laws across the states ProgressiveProfessor Jun 2012 #13
Agreeing to and meeting for a duel is consipiracy to commit a crime. hack89 Jun 2012 #7
I did some searching and it's not clear that dueling is outlawed everywhere. Seems it would be. AlinPA Jun 2012 #21
A simple and non-controversial fix hack89 Jun 2012 #22
You lost me at "each of us threatens the other" slackmaster Jun 2012 #18
I wonder if SYG laws may some day be found safeinOhio Jun 2012 #28
By that standard every law in America is unconstitutional. nt hack89 Jun 2012 #30
I think that anytime someone doesn't immediately protect himself, and takes time Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just an observation about...»Reply #33