Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ken Bone is actually kind of an awful guy [View all]Oneironaut
(6,301 posts)39. Good thing I'm perfect in every way. I will now self-righteously judge him,
because this is the internet, and that's what we do.
What's the point of this article? It's not like he's trying to become the next Pope. This is crappy, pointless gutter journalism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stop looking for heroes. This was just a dude. Why people fell in love stumps me
NightWatcher
Oct 2016
#3
Same here. Undecided equals either not paying attention, extremly stupid, or too afraid to admit
FSogol
Oct 2016
#5
To be undecided at this point is like being presented with two glasses, and you must drink one.
trotsky
Oct 2016
#16
Agreed. But this is a particularly cringe-worthy example of oversharing.
nomorenomore08
Oct 2016
#58
I suspect, given the full context of that post, he was trying to be funny.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2016
#65
Wouldn't be so bad by itself, but in composite, it's one more thing that make the guy seem
nomorenomore08
Oct 2016
#77
I would surely agree for anyone who had not sought out the Lawrence images (assuming he
petronius
Oct 2016
#19
Anyone that posts shit like he has is in no position to complain (or others).
JanMichael
Oct 2016
#21
If no "concern" (your message) why take your time and post? Time and space waster? nt
JanMichael
Oct 2016
#46
That's harsh but he's the one who decided to cash-in on his undeserved celebrity.
BlueStater
Oct 2016
#18
How he'd get "famous" in the first place? Via rambling YouTube videos, like a lot of folks? n/t
nomorenomore08
Oct 2016
#78
His private search history should be private. Why should anyone else care?
clutterbox1830
Oct 2016
#32
just for clarity- they didn't hack his computer. He participated in a reddit AMA
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2016
#50
Honestly, when I read the headlines, I assumed it was going to be a lot worse.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2016
#83
He just sounds like a guy. The Trayvon thing in context isn't defending it. The rest is just guy.
nolabear
Oct 2016
#34
I mostly agree. It's just that the few things I've read about him, combined, make him seem
nomorenomore08
Oct 2016
#79
Next, we'll find he rented "Rocco Ravishes Prague" from a video store in '96, and NEVER RETURNED IT
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2016
#43
LOL... right?! And, now let's for a brief second think how scared these Donald accusers have to be.
Divine Discontent
Oct 2016
#42
Agreed! I'd question his sanity after Don's collapse the past few days, if he's not for Hilllary.
Divine Discontent
Oct 2016
#45
He's allegedly a fucking undecided. How bright can one be to be undecided even at the last debate?
lonestarnot
Oct 2016
#52
I do believe his 15 minutes of fame has come to an abrupt stop. He was going to vote for
Jim Beard
Oct 2016
#53
So this is the type of person Gallup picks for one of the most important debates ever!
MattP
Oct 2016
#57
what should matter, actually, is the questions they ask, not their posting history on the internet.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2016
#69