Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Man convicted of raping 10 year old has verdict overturned; Prosecution didn't prove lack of consent [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)40. He remains convicted of that
He remains convicted of the more serious charge.
This article buries that fact, in an attempt to make it appear that the guy is walking.
What the various technical definitions are of these various charges is beside the point.
Do you know that in a lot states, for example, there's no crime called "rape"?
There are various categories of sexual assault. This guy was convicted and remains convicted on the most serious charge of sexual abuse of a minor. The dispute over some lesser charge was or was not technically correct, is like arguing over the parking ticket you got while you were robbing the bank.
Even that charge is going to be retried, but the guy was convicted of exactly what he did, and isn't going anywhere.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Man convicted of raping 10 year old has verdict overturned; Prosecution didn't prove lack of consent [View all]
philosslayer
Oct 2016
OP
And here I was always told that not knowing the law doesn't absolve one of responsibility.
LisaL
Oct 2016
#7
It should not matter, if you a moron from any country, you should go to jail. Was this appealed?
Foggyhill
Oct 2016
#10
There is no situation where an adult man penetrating a 10 year old child is not rape...
Upin
Oct 2016
#39
All he got was six years. And that was before conviction on a rape charge was overturned.
LisaL
Oct 2016
#41