Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

46. It hasn't been overturned

Reply to LisaL (Reply #41)

Sat Oct 22, 2016, 02:32 PM

Oct 2016

It has been ordered retried.

How does his sentence compare to those of other people convicted of the same offense in Austria?

Is his longer than average or shorter than average?

What special treatment do you believe he is getting?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Man convicted of raping 10 year old has verdict overturned; Prosecution didn't prove lack of consent [View all] philosslayer Oct 2016 OP

WTF? Lithos Oct 2016 #1

How could 10 year old consent? LisaL Oct 2016 #2

WTF man the world is a sick place Foggyhill Oct 2016 #3

WTF? PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2016 #4

This is Austria philosslayer Oct 2016 #5

Thank you for pointing this out to me. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2016 #6

And here I was always told that not knowing the law doesn't absolve one of responsibility. LisaL Oct 2016 #7

It should not matter, if you a moron from any country, you should go to jail. Was this appealed? Foggyhill Oct 2016 #10

Why do you suppose he is not in jail? jberryhill Oct 2016 #25

Retrial I hope. elehhhhna Oct 2016 #12

Of how many counts was he already convicted? jberryhill Oct 2016 #23

That's a foolish explanation jberryhill Oct 2016 #24

There is no situation where an adult man penetrating a 10 year old child is not rape... Upin Oct 2016 #39

He remains convicted of that jberryhill Oct 2016 #40

Has the whole world gone mad? Doodley Oct 2016 #8

Appearantly the world has gone GWC58 Oct 2016 #9

The guy is still guilty of the sexual assault of a child jberryhill Oct 2016 #31

And hopefully GWC58 Oct 2016 #34

All he got was six years. And that was before conviction on a rape charge was overturned. LisaL Oct 2016 #41

It hasn't been overturned jberryhill Oct 2016 #46

It's a more serious charge than the one being disputed in this proceeding jberryhill Oct 2016 #42

Where does it say that? LisaL Oct 2016 #43

Are you joking? jberryhill Oct 2016 #45

Sick, wrong, disgusting, horrible.... Nye Bevan Oct 2016 #11

There are a lot more at that site jberryhill Oct 2016 #18

A hard on is a "sexual emergency"? elehhhhna Oct 2016 #13

First clue that there is no consent: When you have to drag & lock them in Pachamama Oct 2016 #14

The child is only 10. LisaL Oct 2016 #15

Take a tour around that newspaper jberryhill Oct 2016 #17

Are you suggesting it didn't actually happen? LisaL Oct 2016 #20

Of how many different crimes was he convicted? jberryhill Oct 2016 #21

Actually the article does say what he was convicted of and what is his LisaL Oct 2016 #27

That's easy jberryhill Oct 2016 #30

according to US law treestar Oct 2016 #36

Interesting newspaper that one jberryhill Oct 2016 #16

they are trying to get people here to defend the rapist because they are muslim JI7 Oct 2016 #19

The story doesn't say how many counts were NOT thrown out jberryhill Oct 2016 #22

Well actually it does. LisaL Oct 2016 #26

You know what, you're right jberryhill Oct 2016 #28

The problem is, prosecutors having to prove victim didn't consent when victim was 10. LisaL Oct 2016 #32

It doesn't matter jberryhill Oct 2016 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author Binkie The Clown Oct 2016 #29

This is a right wing site that is not reliable. Please self delete. yardwork Oct 2016 #35

Why Calculating Oct 2016 #38

What does his being a refugee have to do with it? jberryhill Oct 2016 #44