Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rdking647

(5,113 posts)

10. they are on private property.

Reply to Achilleaze (Reply #8)

Mon Oct 24, 2016, 11:39 AM

Oct 2016

they are protesting on private property.

frankly if i owned teh land they were on I would be pissed to and would do whatever i could to move them off my land

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Far Will North Dakota Go to Get This Pipeline? [View all] G_j Oct 2016 OP

How far will they go to put it near the Indian Resewrvation instead of near white towns? Coyotl Oct 2016 #1

Reminds me of the brutal tactics of CA police against Okies and unionists pinboy3niner Oct 2016 #2

Or this: tblue37 Oct 2016 #3

Big Oil owns this state, now. Oil is a curse. Odin2005 Oct 2016 #4

Big oil is definitely underestimating who they are up against womanofthehills Oct 2016 #5

Also, North Dakota is one of the states with the fewest regulations for the oil companies womanofthehills Oct 2016 #6

yes G_j Oct 2016 #9

i dont know if i would call it peacefull rdking647 Oct 2016 #7

They are Protectors. Deal with it. Calling them "protestors" is repeating BS oil co. (R) spin Achilleaze Oct 2016 #8

they are on private property. rdking647 Oct 2016 #10

They are on unceded treaty land Achilleaze Oct 2016 #11

Kick G_j Oct 2016 #12