Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(55,334 posts)

9. She's cherry picking. He's 16% in one poll. But only 10% in two other polls from the same day.

Wed Dec 28, 2011, 10:14 PM

Dec 2011

Iowa really doesn't represent the (pardon the oxymoron) mainstream Republican voter. It's still Romney's to lose and Gingrich's to win.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just as Rachel predicted: Santorum surges in Iowa. [View all] RandySF Dec 2011 OP

Are we out of the woods as far as Jeb ? As long a Poppy & Kkkarl orpupilofnature57 Dec 2011 #1

Surges? My gorge rises at it. nt Xipe Totec Dec 2011 #2

just the media trying to drum up interest is something ThomThom Dec 2011 #5

I cannot resist... cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #3

this is way better than the Three Stooges! JohnWxy Dec 2011 #4

The only signs I see around town are Santorum and Perry. Frustratedlady Dec 2011 #6

Is surging the same as frothing? The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2011 #7

He's the surge with the froth on the top. Loki Dec 2011 #8

...of the caucus. rucky Dec 2011 #11

I hope Rachel predicts SANTORUM is an a-hole LOSER n/t UTUSN Dec 2011 #12