General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nice Girls Don't Say 'Vagina' -- What The Rep. Lisa Brown Controversy Is Really About [View all]4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Never disagreed.
"No, this legislation is contrary to my (her) Jewish beliefs."
Seems fine so far.
" No, my body is not your property."
This would be relevant if I had claimed otherwise.
"I could keep going,"
I think three is sufficient strawmen for now.
"but I think you are bound and determined to be obtuse on this"
ob·tuse/əbˈt(y)o͞os/
Adjective:
Annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.
Difficult to understand.
Annoying perhaps. Insensitive, well maybe. But you are the one not understanding this.
It went from her being censured for saying naughty words to your rant about your body not being my property.
Let's look instead at the facts: she made this about her. She implied rape. It was presented instead though as her merely saying the word vagina, which caused all the republicans to cringe because it's such an icky word to them, and then she was banned merely for that.
That's not exactly how it played out.
And then it ends with you trying to argue that "no means no" has nothing to do with rape. Which may be the case for you. But to everyone else, and google, that phrase is in reference to rape. http://www.cfs-fcee.ca/nomeansno/index_e.html
I think the mere fact that you feel the need to argue that "no means no" is just a phrase with no context whatsoever just shows the absurdity of your position.