Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Everyone who listens to music needs to READ THIS! [View all]onenote
(46,008 posts)15. They didn't mind for a few reasons
1. The quality of analog dubs was lower than the quality of the original (which wasn't all that great to begin with).
2. It was a labor intensive way to copy things and thus self-limiting in terms of the number of folks who would do it.
It was when music started being available in digital form that the labels got concerned
1. Because the quality of the copy was comparable to the quality of the original.
2. It was easy to copy and transfer copies widely.
The Sound Recording Performance Rights Act of 1994 actually imposed limits on the ability of digital music services to announce their playlists in advance and/or to play more than a limited number of songs by the same artist or from the same album consecutively.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And are they no longer making their music? Have their fan bases shrunk? This is not about artists,
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#20
Thieves need no justification. What is, is, and your options are to deal with it or pretend that it
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#57
What the labels do doesn't excuse her stealing 1,000 albums. That's moral relativism.
kysrsoze
Jun 2012
#5
No it doesn't, but it certainly does demonstrate the disingenuousness of the argument
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#16
Making a digital copy of an existing recording, which may have taken literally...
GReedDiamond
Jun 2012
#60
No, it wasn't. It reprinted the same argument that they've been putting forth for years.
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#21
Not all musicians have the ability to self produce albums the way Trent Reznor and Radiohead do.
Initech
Jun 2012
#9
And something in excess of 98% of all artists are never produced at all.
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#23
if she's a GM at a college radio station, those songs are likely promos.
nashville_brook
Jun 2012
#6
Nothing wrong with Pandora subscriptions, and there are plenty of iTunes alternatives
kysrsoze
Jun 2012
#11
Actually, they did mind and they went to court and lost. Several times over 30 years. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#24
You call stealing being frugal? That's an interesting take, no pun intended. nt
Honeycombe8
Jun 2012
#39
I actually thought this article was decently thought out for the most part, but.......
AverageJoe90
Jun 2012
#34
This shows the old business models the MAFIAA are trying to shove down our throats just don't work.
backscatter712
Jun 2012
#85