Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 10:28 PM Dec 2011

Wall Street Crimes: President Obama is "effectively encouraging future financial fraud" [View all]



Obama and Geithner: Government, Enron-Style
December 20, 2011
By Matt Taibbi

Strongly recommend this piece at the Huffington Post by Jeff Connaughton, a former aide to Senator Ted Kaufman. Jeff is one of the smartest guys on the Hill and is particularly strong on issues surrounding Wall Street and the regulatory system. In this piece, he takes apart the oft-stated mantra that what Wall Street firms did during and after the crisis was maybe unethical, but not illegal.


http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog


-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Obama and the Rule of Law
By Jeff Connaughton
Mr. Connaughton served as Chief of Staff to U.S. Senator Ted Kaufman during the 111th Congress. He previously served as Special Assistant to the Counsel to the President (Abner Mikva) in the Clinton White House (1994-95) and as Special Assistant to then-Chairman Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of the Senate Judiciary Committee (1988-91).
December 19, 2011


Long silent and now contradictory, President Obama needs to deliver a clarifying speech about our financial markets and the rule of law. Speaking in Kansas on December 6, he said, "Too often, we've seen Wall Street firms violating major anti-fraud laws because the penalties are too weak and there's no price for being a repeat offender." Just five days later on 60 Minutes, he said, "Some of the least ethical behavior on Wall Street wasn't illegal." Which is it? Have there been no prosecutions because Wall Street acted legally (albeit unethically)? Or did Wall Street repeatedly violate major anti-fraud laws (and should thus find itself in the dock)?

Moreover, the President is misleading us when he says that Wall Street firms violate anti-fraud law because the penalties are too weak. Repeat financial fraudsters don't pay relatively paltry -- and therefore painless -- penalties because of statutory caps on such penalties. Rather, regulatory officials, appointed by Obama, negotiated these comparatively trifling fines. This week, the F.D.I.C. settled a suit against Washington Mutual officials for just $64 million, an amount that will be covered mostly by insurance policies WaMu took out on behalf of executives, who themselves will pay just $400,000. And recently a federal judge rejected the S.E.C.'s latest settlement with Citigroup, an action even the Wall Street Journal called "a rebuke of the cozy relationship between regulators and the regulated that too often leaves justice as an orphan."

For three important reasons, the President needs to explain why the Justice Department has filed away its investigations of big banks and Wall Street firms without indicting anyone. First, American confidence in the system is deeply shaken. Second, it strains credulity for millions of Americans -- and has impelled thousands of them to occupy public places in protest -- that no banking or insurance executive deserves criminal prosecution for the actions that brought on the financial crisis. Third, by failing to prosecute a single high-profile Wall Street actor today, the Administration is failing to deter financial fraud tomorrow.

In 1986, speaking about the failure of another president's Justice Department to vigorously prosecute white-collar crime, former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and current Vice President Joseph Biden said that "people believe that our system of law and those who manage it have failed, and may not even have tried, to deal effectively with unethical and possibly illegal misconduct in high places." Until this president stops calling Wall Street's deleterious actions "not illegal," he's failing to deter -- and therefore effectively encouraging -- future financial fraud. And until he gives a clear and full explanation of the inadequate response of his Justice Department and S.E.C., he and his appointees are helping to undermine the public's faith in equal justice under the law.

Read the full article at:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-connaughton/obama-wall-street-laws_b_1157915.html
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I ProSense Dec 2011 #1
The "massive re-regulation" is ignored because it's mainly in your fantasy. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #3
Sure ProSense Dec 2011 #5
There's a difference between regulations and criminal law MFrohike Dec 2011 #49
pffffttttt.... SidDithers Dec 2011 #2
here we go again. la-dee-da. Whisp Dec 2011 #4
Maybe if the bankers would become whistleblowers, the Justice Dept would go after them. Karmadillo Dec 2011 #6
Or ProSense Dec 2011 #7
Or Karmadillo Dec 2011 #10
Or ProSense Dec 2011 #12
Or Karmadillo Dec 2011 #15
What ProSense Dec 2011 #19
What Karmadillo Dec 2011 #21
. ProSense Dec 2011 #28
. Karmadillo Dec 2011 #29
. ProSense Dec 2011 #30
Stop! Rex Dec 2011 #42
Or if they smoke a doobie. SfromCanada Dec 2011 #58
Obama. Baaaad!!11 tridim Dec 2011 #8
HA!!!! Rex Dec 2011 #43
Oustanding!!!! JoePhilly Dec 2011 #59
Why han't the Republican majority in the House dealt with this? Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #9
I acknowledge your persistent and unending personal attacks on DU'ers with a nice big ignore! Better Believe It Dec 2011 #11
Good one...see yeah! Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #14
"your tireless efforts to undermine Obama's re-election on this board. " girl gone mad Dec 2011 #16
No problem. Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #20
Oh the drama!!11! girl gone mad Dec 2011 #23
The "smartest guy on the hill" sounds like an asshat bhikkhu Dec 2011 #13
A good place to start would have been reinstating Glass-Steagall dflprincess Dec 2011 #17
The Dodd-Frank Bill is stronger in many ways than Glass-Steagall bhikkhu Dec 2011 #22
Dodd-Frank does not separate investment from commercial banking as Glass-Steagall did dflprincess Dec 2011 #26
oh bullshit - Dodd Frank is much stronger - it handles banned from Kos Dec 2011 #27
The article I linked to & quoted was not written by Matt Taibbi dflprincess Dec 2011 #31
What do you think of the Volker Rule in that context? bhikkhu Dec 2011 #36
Interesting dflprincess Dec 2011 #37
LMFAO.. yeah D/F would be much stronger SomethingFishy Dec 2011 #32
Thanks for the article - I hadn't seen that bhikkhu Dec 2011 #34
Your wikipedia link isn't working. And please read "Blowing a Hole in Dodd-Frank" Better Believe It Dec 2011 #18
...and a newer article about how that ended up working out: bhikkhu Dec 2011 #24
Matt Taibbi - Jackass, Tampon, and Mental Midget - but Rolling Stone pays him banned from Kos Dec 2011 #25
And you have no facts to refute him so SomethingFishy Dec 2011 #33
That's obviously his best and only shot! Better Believe It Dec 2011 #35
He had no facts to refute treestar Dec 2011 #46
LOL - not all of us here are above the age of 21, lol. closeupready Dec 2011 #48
That is pathetic. hifiguy Dec 2011 #60
"no prosecutions"... boppers Dec 2011 #38
The Wall Street bankstars are whining everyday about all their pals who are going to prison. Better Believe It Dec 2011 #39
Goalposts: boppers Dec 2011 #52
Prosecutions of Wall Street financial crimes are at hifiguy Dec 2011 #61
And goal posts again: "a much lower level" boppers Dec 2011 #63
+1...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #44
du rec. nt xchrom Dec 2011 #40
Kick Better Believe It Dec 2011 #41
If something is not illegal, it can't be prosecuted treestar Dec 2011 #45
Sorry, but fraud is still illegal. girl gone mad Dec 2011 #50
Fraud is illegal, but requires proof treestar Dec 2011 #55
Just keep shifting the goal posts. girl gone mad Dec 2011 #62
Yes, because if there is no deterrent to stealing big money, closeupready Dec 2011 #47
Obviously true. Quantess Dec 2011 #51
I don't remember Obama using the phrase "not illegal", which is cited as a direct quote in the OP. Nye Bevan Dec 2011 #53
Here you go . . . gratuitous Dec 2011 #54
Do you normally remember every word or phrase President Obama utters? Better Believe It Dec 2011 #57
Recommended Autumn Dec 2011 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street Crimes: Pre...