Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
29. I don't understand
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:22 PM
Jun 2012

the bit about Vicki Kennedy being neutral. What the heck? Is she supposed to keep her mouth shut and offer no opinions just to please Scott Brown?

Wow. If I was Vicki Kennedy, I would immediately release a statement that I would offer my opinions just like every other American has the right to do, and if Scott Brown is too chicken to debate because he's scared of my opinions, then he's not suitable to be running for office.

My goodness. Who does he think he is?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Would he accept Faux News? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #1
Yes'm politicasista Jun 2012 #2
Not only Accept Fox News... AsahinaKimi Jun 2012 #36
Fat chance!!! Vicki Kennedy will be for Warren, end of discussion. hrmjustin Jun 2012 #3
he's a coward warrior1 Jun 2012 #4
Being a coward is the least of it. GoCubsGo Jun 2012 #20
Yeah. MightyOkie Jun 2012 #30
Yes, interrupting someone who is trying to speak is heckling. GoCubsGo Jun 2012 #34
I'm sure he'd like our local ABC affiliate to host the debate Blaukraut Jun 2012 #5
What a chickenshit Champion Jack Jun 2012 #6
I smell a lily-livered coward graywarrior Jun 2012 #7
Wait just a darn minute. By stipulating that Vicki Kennedy, a private citizen, stay neutral Arkansas Granny Jun 2012 #8
Maybe if she was a Corporation dumping millions into Scott Brown's accounts he'd be ok with that LynneSin Jun 2012 #24
I don't like this game I'm gonna take my ball and go home! tularetom Jun 2012 #9
Local station hosting=NO national audience ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2012 #10
Sounds like he's looking for a way out of the debates graywarrior Jun 2012 #11
YES! Who's ever heard of demanding "neutrality" from the widow ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2012 #12
He made some kind of statement last week that "they keep calling it Teddy's seat." graywarrior Jun 2012 #13
It always will be and that man has disgraced it. n/t cynatnite Jun 2012 #16
Yes, he has graywarrior Jun 2012 #18
This from the guy who lives on RW and RW sports radio here in MA chelsea0011 Jun 2012 #14
If it were the other way around abelenkpe Jun 2012 #15
what? he doesn't like joe scarborough? ron christie? michael steele? david gregory? mark halperin? spanone Jun 2012 #17
EW should say: "What's next Scott? Do you demand Sean Hannity hold Rectangle Jun 2012 #19
Yoda sez: theaocp Jun 2012 #21
He's afraid that he might be acosted by ||||||shudder|||||||| ashling Jun 2012 #22
Wonder what he is so afraid of? Omaha Steve Jun 2012 #23
eom RUMMYisFROSTED Jun 2012 #25
He is such a vagina! GreatCaesarsGhost Jun 2012 #26
So someone else in the GOP wants to silence a woman's voice krawhitham Jun 2012 #27
What a woose, I guess he would agree to a debate if EW would drop out of the race. Thinkingabout Jun 2012 #28
I don't understand Aerows Jun 2012 #29
Elizabeth Warren will debate Sen. Brown on the condition that Fox News drops out. longship Jun 2012 #31
He is simply trying to not debate. egbertowillies Jun 2012 #32
You know, this is funny. Jamaal510 Jun 2012 #33
Translation: excuse, excuse, smokescreen, jump to my tune, score points with my fans at no cost JHB Jun 2012 #35
How about co-questioners? Maddow/Hayes? SoCalDem Jun 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen. Brown will debate El...»Reply #29