Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)
1. True, true, but.....
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:36 PM
Oct 2016

What gets me is that people talk about classified material, or any portion thereof, as a monolithic entity. Either it is or it isnt.

Not reality. Information is temporal, and it is context specific.

Today, I can talk about x and it isn't classified nor is there any reason to think it should be. A month from now, someone several agencies away could deem it classified. I of course might have no idea they did that. But run my old emails past them and bang, it is classified.

Or, information might be classified until a specific date, but not after.

Or, context is important. The name and location of an embassy by itself isn't classified, but would be in the context of a specific activity.

But to the press, it's either classified or it isnt. So you better not discuss the location of the American embassy in russia, because it appears in several top secret documents. Maybe. I have no first hand information on that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regarding Security of Cla...»Reply #1