Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
7. Or
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 10:52 PM
Dec 2011

"Maybe if the bankers would become whistleblowers, the Justice Dept would go after them."

...maybe not.

US Department of Labor finds Bank of America in violation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower protection provisions

Bank ordered to reinstate fired employee and pay $930,000

SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has found Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America Corp. in violation of the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for improperly firing an employee. The bank has been ordered to reinstate and pay the employee approximately $930,000, which includes back wages, interest, compensatory damages and attorney fees. The findings follow an investigation by OSHA's San Francisco Regional Office, which was initiated after receiving a complaint from the Los Angeles-area employee.

"It's clear from our investigation that Bank of America used illegal retaliatory tactics against this employee," said OSHA Assistant Secretary Dr. David Michaels. "This employee showed great courage reporting potential fraud and standing up for the rights of other employees to do the same."

The employee originally worked for Countrywide Financial Corp., which merged with Bank of America in July 2008. The employee led internal investigations that revealed widespread and pervasive wire, mail and bank fraud involving Countrywide employees. The employee alleged that those who attempted to report fraud to Countrywide's Employee Relations Department suffered persistent retaliation. The employee was fired shortly after the merger.

"Whistleblowers play a vital role in ensuring the integrity of our financial system, as well as the safety of our food, air, water, workplaces and transportation systems," added Michaels. "This case highlights the importance of defending employees against retaliation when they try to protect the public from the consequences of an employer's illegal activities."

Both the complainant and Bank of America can appeal the monetary damages to the Labor Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges within 30 days of receiving the findings.

OSHA enforces the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and 20 other statutes protecting employees who report violations of various airline, commercial motor carrier, consumer product, environmental, financial reform, food safety, health care reform, nuclear, pipeline, public transportation agency, railroad and maritime laws. Under these laws enacted by Congress, employers are prohibited from retaliating against employees who raise various protected concerns or provide protected information to the employer or to the government. Employees who believe that they have been retaliated against for engaging in protected conduct may file a complaint with the secretary of labor to request an investigation by OSHA's Whistleblower Protection Program. Detailed information on employee whistleblower rights, including fact sheets, is available at http://www.whistleblowers.gov .

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov .

http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/osha/OSHA20111351.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I ProSense Dec 2011 #1
The "massive re-regulation" is ignored because it's mainly in your fantasy. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #3
Sure ProSense Dec 2011 #5
There's a difference between regulations and criminal law MFrohike Dec 2011 #49
pffffttttt.... SidDithers Dec 2011 #2
here we go again. la-dee-da. Whisp Dec 2011 #4
Maybe if the bankers would become whistleblowers, the Justice Dept would go after them. Karmadillo Dec 2011 #6
Or ProSense Dec 2011 #7
Or Karmadillo Dec 2011 #10
Or ProSense Dec 2011 #12
Or Karmadillo Dec 2011 #15
What ProSense Dec 2011 #19
What Karmadillo Dec 2011 #21
. ProSense Dec 2011 #28
. Karmadillo Dec 2011 #29
. ProSense Dec 2011 #30
Stop! Rex Dec 2011 #42
Or if they smoke a doobie. SfromCanada Dec 2011 #58
Obama. Baaaad!!11 tridim Dec 2011 #8
HA!!!! Rex Dec 2011 #43
Oustanding!!!! JoePhilly Dec 2011 #59
Why han't the Republican majority in the House dealt with this? Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #9
I acknowledge your persistent and unending personal attacks on DU'ers with a nice big ignore! Better Believe It Dec 2011 #11
Good one...see yeah! Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #14
"your tireless efforts to undermine Obama's re-election on this board. " girl gone mad Dec 2011 #16
No problem. Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #20
Oh the drama!!11! girl gone mad Dec 2011 #23
The "smartest guy on the hill" sounds like an asshat bhikkhu Dec 2011 #13
A good place to start would have been reinstating Glass-Steagall dflprincess Dec 2011 #17
The Dodd-Frank Bill is stronger in many ways than Glass-Steagall bhikkhu Dec 2011 #22
Dodd-Frank does not separate investment from commercial banking as Glass-Steagall did dflprincess Dec 2011 #26
oh bullshit - Dodd Frank is much stronger - it handles banned from Kos Dec 2011 #27
The article I linked to & quoted was not written by Matt Taibbi dflprincess Dec 2011 #31
What do you think of the Volker Rule in that context? bhikkhu Dec 2011 #36
Interesting dflprincess Dec 2011 #37
LMFAO.. yeah D/F would be much stronger SomethingFishy Dec 2011 #32
Thanks for the article - I hadn't seen that bhikkhu Dec 2011 #34
Your wikipedia link isn't working. And please read "Blowing a Hole in Dodd-Frank" Better Believe It Dec 2011 #18
...and a newer article about how that ended up working out: bhikkhu Dec 2011 #24
Matt Taibbi - Jackass, Tampon, and Mental Midget - but Rolling Stone pays him banned from Kos Dec 2011 #25
And you have no facts to refute him so SomethingFishy Dec 2011 #33
That's obviously his best and only shot! Better Believe It Dec 2011 #35
He had no facts to refute treestar Dec 2011 #46
LOL - not all of us here are above the age of 21, lol. closeupready Dec 2011 #48
That is pathetic. hifiguy Dec 2011 #60
"no prosecutions"... boppers Dec 2011 #38
The Wall Street bankstars are whining everyday about all their pals who are going to prison. Better Believe It Dec 2011 #39
Goalposts: boppers Dec 2011 #52
Prosecutions of Wall Street financial crimes are at hifiguy Dec 2011 #61
And goal posts again: "a much lower level" boppers Dec 2011 #63
+1...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #44
du rec. nt xchrom Dec 2011 #40
Kick Better Believe It Dec 2011 #41
If something is not illegal, it can't be prosecuted treestar Dec 2011 #45
Sorry, but fraud is still illegal. girl gone mad Dec 2011 #50
Fraud is illegal, but requires proof treestar Dec 2011 #55
Just keep shifting the goal posts. girl gone mad Dec 2011 #62
Yes, because if there is no deterrent to stealing big money, closeupready Dec 2011 #47
Obviously true. Quantess Dec 2011 #51
I don't remember Obama using the phrase "not illegal", which is cited as a direct quote in the OP. Nye Bevan Dec 2011 #53
Here you go . . . gratuitous Dec 2011 #54
Do you normally remember every word or phrase President Obama utters? Better Believe It Dec 2011 #57
Recommended Autumn Dec 2011 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street Crimes: Pre...»Reply #7