Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

librechik

(30,957 posts)

6. of course

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Mon Nov 21, 2016, 10:44 AM

Nov 2016

Now let me get back to the excited admiring coos and snivels of the media girls reporting on the "President Elect's Transition" and the celebrities, demonic apparitions, lunatics with battalions at their command, and various slimy carpetbaggers he is about to make our legal representatives to the world. Pass the hemlock (Supreme Court) burp.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Okay, "Neo-Nazi" not "Alt-Right." [View all] kpete Nov 2016 OP

And NOW the NYT is "concerned." They got HITLER wrong, too. nt MADem Nov 2016 #1

Look just because they act like neo-nazis and talk like neo-nazis that's no reason . . . nt el_bryanto Nov 2016 #2

And yet, people still tell me to stop over-reacting, and to give Trump a chance Siwsan Nov 2016 #3

So much Economic Anxiety in that article. n/t geomon666 Nov 2016 #4

I call the alt-right what they really are: "The Go Fuck Yourself Party". Initech Nov 2016 #5

of course librechik Nov 2016 #6

I believe their prefered term for "terrorists" is Radical Islamic randr Nov 2016 #7

...and not just the Illinois kind: FailureToCommunicate Nov 2016 #8

The benign term "ALT-Right" masks the KKK origins of them BumRushDaShow Nov 2016 #9