Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Dustlawyer

(10,539 posts)

20. It's what the Cake Baker tried to do to the gay couple

Reply to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #2)

Wed Nov 23, 2016, 11:34 PM

Nov 2016

except gays became a protected class. The Trumpsters not so much! Now some will know how it really feels to be discriminated against! Oh the irony!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Business owner refusing service to Trump supporters [View all] philosslayer Nov 2016 OP

I sympathize, but he probably can't do that. HassleCat Nov 2016 #1

No. The First Amendment applies to government actions, The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2016 #2

Exactly n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #9

Until they get the law amended to protect the class of stupid assholes and leave others out. nt rzemanfl Nov 2016 #13

It's what the Cake Baker tried to do to the gay couple Dustlawyer Nov 2016 #20

No it doesn't. djg21 Nov 2016 #41

You are under no compulsion to do business with Nazis philosslayer Nov 2016 #3

The aggrieved parties may sue him. HassleCat Nov 2016 #6

Political party isn't a protected class though n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #10

People can choose not to support Trump. forgotmylogin Nov 2016 #21

I know SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #22

Sorry, I was replying to the general "they can't do that" response. forgotmylogin Nov 2016 #24

Ah, got it n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #25

No. djg21 Nov 2016 #42

True. Where's Elwood and Jake when you need them? Initech Nov 2016 #12

elwood and jake. mopinko Nov 2016 #30

The first amendment, and the second, and the third.. all of 'em -- only apply to the state. X_Digger Nov 2016 #7

it violates the interstate commerce clause, mopinko Nov 2016 #31

That is a very loose interpretation of the ICC. Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #37

No, it does not. whopis01 Nov 2016 #38

i am just remembering a jfk joke. mopinko Nov 2016 #40

All Trumpers will claim this, but the 1st amendment says "Congress shall pass no law. . . Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #36

No it does not...is is wise? Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #43

he'll probably get a lot of support and possibly more business. liberalla Nov 2016 #4

I live here and will do everything I can to support him.... alittlelark Nov 2016 #5

I'm constantly being solicited by SEO companies ToxMarz Nov 2016 #8

Remember in the hippie days? ailsagirl Nov 2016 #11

Several times in life bucolic_frolic Nov 2016 #17

That's awful ailsagirl Nov 2016 #29

Wonderful to see discrimination rear its head in public, isnt it? 7962 Nov 2016 #14

As has been noted above, political affiliation is not a protected class hatrack Nov 2016 #23

Being "legal" doesnt make this right. Its discrimination. 7962 Nov 2016 #26

It is still wrong. Statistical Nov 2016 #33

This is right HipHipHillary Nov 2016 #35

A slippery slope bucolic_frolic Nov 2016 #15

You can't support this and complain about refusal of services to LGBT community. LS_Editor Nov 2016 #16

Apparently few here agree with you 7962 Nov 2016 #27

ls i agree dembotoz Nov 2016 #32

Everybody missing the point SCantiGOP Nov 2016 #18

Hats off to them.... paleotn Nov 2016 #19

I wish him well, and completely agree. mountain grammy Nov 2016 #28

Sorry it is wrong. Statistical Nov 2016 #34

And they have been refused service...but you can not do it based on a person's sex...IE being female Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #44

He couldn't do it if there was a union contract louis c Nov 2016 #39