Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We didn't lose the E.C. ..... they cheated Botany Nov 2016 #1
It's a byzantine system. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #3
And like everything else edhopper Nov 2016 #4
What the EC was purportedly designed to PREVENT has HAPPENED in spite of it. CousinIT Nov 2016 #5
Federalist 68 DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #6
Pure horse puckey. CousinIT Nov 2016 #7
That takes a Constitutional Amendment DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #9
Not to mention the Republican majority. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #15
Good luck getting smaller states onboard Abq_Sarah Nov 2016 #65
I did everything within the law to stop him and will continue to do so and urge others to continue DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #8
But geez this is a demagogue treestar Nov 2016 #14
The Constitution does not tell Electors how to vote. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #18
Whoever the majority wants should be POTUS treestar Nov 2016 #19
They were designed to be superdelegates who could correct mistakes DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #30
We end up in the weeds, though. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #34
Theoretically a candidate can win the E C with 23% of the vote. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #36
Based on voting-age Americans... yallerdawg Nov 2016 #41
Complicated indeed. EL34x4 Nov 2016 #59
The Founding Fathers had the prescience to see voters could get it wrong. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #55
Here is their chance to dump the demigod.. pangaia Nov 2016 #53
I agree it is our obligation. Quayblue Nov 2016 #2
Move on... HipHipHillary Nov 2016 #10
Why would you use the popular vote to elect a monarch? DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #11
Why worry about how we look? treestar Nov 2016 #13
I am under no illusion we can overturn the election results. That's kind of silly. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #21
And we ought to harp on that for four years treestar Nov 2016 #22
Bush lost by 500,000 votes. Racist McRacist Face is going to lose by more than five times that. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #23
Yes! Let's make sure he is referred to as treestar Nov 2016 #27
It will always be there lingering in the background. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #33
"The popular vote is something you would use to elect a king"?? Maeve Nov 2016 #17
I don't think he or she put a lot of thought into that one. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #20
I get it, though. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #29
You can argue it both ways. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #31
I'd say a measure of equal power. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #37
Wow, I didn't know Monarchies were a democracy. Who knew? kcr Nov 2016 #42
Uh, no. People don't elect kings. pnwmom Nov 2016 #64
I just hope they do it treestar Nov 2016 #12
And those 100,000 votes edhopper Nov 2016 #16
I believe the voter purging in Wisconsin surely cause her loss there. SharonAnn Nov 2016 #28
Insisting we didn't really lose is a good way to learn no lessons from this disaster. Marr Nov 2016 #24
I don't think we should casually dismiss the fact that 2,700,000 more people voted for Clinton. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #26
absolutely; she WON the people. Trump won the square miles. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #49
The more isolated you are from your fellow Americans the more likely you are a Trump voter DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #50
get a clue- certain parts of the country will NEVER vote dem. the E.C. guarantees that dems give TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #52
You might as well wish for candy to grow in your garden. Marr Nov 2016 #60
Not my president and never will be. lark Nov 2016 #25
The 2.5 million is more than the total Trump vote in 11 states. Here's the pie: Coyotl Nov 2016 #32
Wow, this is one pie that makes me sick to my stomach RiverStone Nov 2016 #62
Yes, they said about the Supreme Court, let voters speak, we spoke. Coyotl Nov 2016 #66
If our candidate was significantly more popular loyalsister Nov 2016 #35
Your argument DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #38
A for effort, maybe loyalsister Nov 2016 #39
Standards matter when the candidate with the lowest standards win. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #40
The baggage was different loyalsister Nov 2016 #56
You get an F: Regurgitating 'Clinton Cash' lies is an automatic fail. emulatorloo Nov 2016 #57
I'm pointing out that the mythology was easy to create loyalsister Nov 2016 #61
It sure becomes our problem though, doesn't it? kcr Nov 2016 #43
You mean like suggesting our candidate was one of the most popular in history loyalsister Nov 2016 #48
More fabricated bullshit. No one 'suggested' that. emulatorloo Nov 2016 #58
correct; Trump voters liked what they heard. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #47
HCR was elected the same DT was Cosmocat Nov 2016 #44
personally, i'm not willing to give repubs a head-start on every single prez election. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #54
Ignoring clear calcuable odds is born out of arrogance RiverStone Nov 2016 #63
Ironically, the EC was intended to prevent the very thing that happened.... jack_krass Nov 2016 #45
"the game" right now, is the electoral college and hackable computer vote counting. they both need TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #46
In a fascist government... kentuck Nov 2016 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We won the pop vote by 2,...»Reply #47