Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tinrobot

(12,053 posts)
24. This is simply is about one person one vote
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 02:49 AM
Nov 2016

Since more voters live in cities, then perhaps they will have more say (or not, since they don't vote as a block)

But the fundamental concept is equal representation - one person, one vote, regardless of location.

If you think state borders matter more than that concept, then we have a fundamental disagreement and nothing more to argue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Voice is nowhere near proportional to population. LisaL Nov 2016 #1
I think that's what he said dumbcat Nov 2016 #2
You don't see the non-sequitur in this? Dem2 Nov 2016 #12
The difference is hardly earth shattering JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #17
In NH, based on electoral college and swing state status, Dem2 Nov 2016 #21
You are right. You got the power. tinrobot Nov 2016 #22
Yep, we can't go tinkering with the Constitution. William769 Nov 2016 #25
We have changed the constitution when we needed to. JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #26
I'm sorry but a state with 30 million shouldn't be reduced to the same voice as 1 million. onecaliberal Nov 2016 #3
Should a state with only 2 million Abq_Sarah Nov 2016 #4
They should have a voice that represents their 2 million not have 3.5 times the voice of the 30 onecaliberal Nov 2016 #5
In other words, no voice Abq_Sarah Nov 2016 #6
Or how about just one person one vote? tinrobot Nov 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author onecaliberal Nov 2016 #19
Please explain that for me. JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #10
Wyoming has 600,000 people, California has 38 million. tinrobot Nov 2016 #23
They are not - states with larger populations have more electoral votes csziggy Nov 2016 #15
We're deciding elections based on lines drawn on a map centuries ago. tinrobot Nov 2016 #8
So, are you saying that our legislature is outmoded too? JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #9
Not no voice. But they are a minority. Liberal In Texas Nov 2016 #11
And since national governance is a consensus of states... JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #14
This is simply is about one person one vote tinrobot Nov 2016 #24
"Those lines still determine the makeup of our current government." JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #13
The Congressional districts aren't all that proportional JonLP24 Nov 2016 #16
And that has nothing whatever to do with the Electoral College. nt JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #18
I was addressing this line JonLP24 Nov 2016 #20
It's still irrelevant. JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #28
The election is the product of the process. JayhawkSD Nov 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thoughts on the Electoral...»Reply #24