Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Without free and open elections a government leader is not legitimate. [View all]Exilednight
(9,359 posts)41. Then here's a question I have.
If they are not legitimate governments, then why do the US, including both parties and almost every nominee of every political stripe and every major figure of both major parties, including Obama, both Clintons, both Bushs, every Secretary of State, member of the Senate and House of Representatives recognize them as the legitimate government?
These are the kind of statements that makes our party look inept.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Without free and open elections a government leader is not legitimate. [View all]
Skinner
Nov 2016
OP
And if the people in an area don't have the right to freely emigrate from that area....
PoliticAverse
Nov 2016
#2
Here's something I just posted about Cuba's other revolutionaries ... who gave their lives ...
eppur_se_muova
Nov 2016
#6
Ok then. Why didn't Castro let the Cuban people render their judgement on his rule?
Skinner
Nov 2016
#30
Castro cannot be held responsible for his own actions because the United States is bad.
Skinner
Nov 2016
#31