Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(2,108 posts)

6. Take a look at how Vox explains the conundrum ...

Sun Nov 27, 2016, 06:42 PM

Nov 2016

Though you'll be chagrined to learn there is no remedy or consequence likely to occur ~

We are through the looking glass

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/23/13715150/donald-trump-emoluments-clause-constitution

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Are there legal sanctions against conflicts of interest... [View all] LAS14 Nov 2016 OP

Inquiring minds would like to know? yortsed snacilbuper Nov 2016 #1

If the president does it it is not illegal nt doc03 Nov 2016 #2

That is so Richard Nixon! MiniMe Nov 2016 #4

EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2016 #3

Hoping someone has an answer. LAS14 Nov 2016 #5

Take a look at how Vox explains the conundrum ... SticksnStones Nov 2016 #6

From an editorial in the WSJ question everything Nov 2016 #7

The body charged with policing this is Congress gratuitous Nov 2016 #9

Only if you have a real justice department. ananda Nov 2016 #10