Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why are people getting all bent out of shape over Castro dying? [View all]flamingdem
(40,813 posts)58. Here's one: Black Radicals Owe a Great Deal to Fidel Castro
http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2016/11/black-radicals-owe-a-great-deal-to-fidel-castro/
The Cuban leader, who died Friday, could be considered a founding father of the black radical movements of the 1960s. He is remembered not only for his in-your-face defiance of the United States but for creating a third-world Marxist nation that stood as a beacon for the oppressed during the 20th century.
Fidel Castro meeting Malcolm X in 1960.
The Harlem audience was determined to cheer everything Nelson Mandela said, which meant that ABC Nightline anchor Ted Koppel had to accept that he was at a disadvantagewhat he called a hometown crowd.
It was 1990, and black America had been in the throes of Republican leadership for a decade. The Cold War had not begun to cool. Mandelaviewed then as a revolutionary leader of the African National Congress trying to destroy the white-minority racist apartheid regime of South Africa, not the cuddly teddy bear of reconciliation of a democratic one-party state that would define him laterhad been recently freed thanks to a worldwide movement on his behalf. A critic in the crowd asked tough questions about Mandelas support of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and Cuban leader Fidel Castro.
I remember Mandelas words as if it was yesterday: One of the mistakes that some political analysts make is to think that their enemies should be our enemies. That we cant and will never do. The crowd exploded in applause for almost a minute after the first sentence. When was the last time a black leader sounded that intellectually decolonized on national television? Since Stokely Carmichael in the late 1960s?
We have our own struggle, which we are conducting, Mandela patiently explained, and our attitude toward any country is determined by the attitude of that country to our struggle. More thunder from the crowd.
The Cuban leader, who died Friday, could be considered a founding father of the black radical movements of the 1960s. He is remembered not only for his in-your-face defiance of the United States but for creating a third-world Marxist nation that stood as a beacon for the oppressed during the 20th century.
Fidel Castro meeting Malcolm X in 1960.
The Harlem audience was determined to cheer everything Nelson Mandela said, which meant that ABC Nightline anchor Ted Koppel had to accept that he was at a disadvantagewhat he called a hometown crowd.
It was 1990, and black America had been in the throes of Republican leadership for a decade. The Cold War had not begun to cool. Mandelaviewed then as a revolutionary leader of the African National Congress trying to destroy the white-minority racist apartheid regime of South Africa, not the cuddly teddy bear of reconciliation of a democratic one-party state that would define him laterhad been recently freed thanks to a worldwide movement on his behalf. A critic in the crowd asked tough questions about Mandelas support of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and Cuban leader Fidel Castro.
I remember Mandelas words as if it was yesterday: One of the mistakes that some political analysts make is to think that their enemies should be our enemies. That we cant and will never do. The crowd exploded in applause for almost a minute after the first sentence. When was the last time a black leader sounded that intellectually decolonized on national television? Since Stokely Carmichael in the late 1960s?
We have our own struggle, which we are conducting, Mandela patiently explained, and our attitude toward any country is determined by the attitude of that country to our struggle. More thunder from the crowd.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
wasn't that because of the backing of the soviet union ? and once the soviet union started to fall
JI7
Nov 2016
#16
Anti-American and or Anti-Western equals Fucking Awesome Revolutionary Bro
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Nov 2016
#4
I'm not ACTUALLY indicating that he was not evil, just wondering why we have folks here attacking
bravenak
Nov 2016
#9
There is no good reason to celebrate any crackpot dictator for their spoken word performances
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Nov 2016
#17
Few, if any of the "anticommunists" wanted a decent, progressive future for the world.
Ken Burch
Nov 2016
#23
"Anticommunists" is a euphemism for "Fascists" - I met a few of them in the 60's.
Zen Democrat
Nov 2016
#36
Most of the Latin Americans who have become American citizens are from Mexico
Ken Burch
Nov 2016
#48
Taking the bait to say that Castro exists because the USA has dominated Cuba for two
flamingdem
Nov 2016
#45