Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(85,381 posts)

4. That's not directly relevant

Mon Nov 28, 2016, 01:23 PM

Nov 2016

Our response isn't really relevant to the nature of the act.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is state sponsored hacking an act of war? [View all] Renew Deal Nov 2016 OP

That's an interesting question el_bryanto Nov 2016 #1

Not sure - are we ready to go to war with say - Russia? China? jmg257 Nov 2016 #2

That's not directly relevant Renew Deal Nov 2016 #4

Right? 2naSalit Nov 2016 #5

Is cyberwar war? Iggo Nov 2016 #3

It's an act of aggression BainsBane Nov 2016 #6

What's the intent of the hacking? Gain intelligence? Destroy neverforget Nov 2016 #7

The Pentagon said so in 2011, but it's definitely espionage. Eugene Nov 2016 #9

It depends on the result. Oneironaut Nov 2016 #12