Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
10. It's actually more likely to speed things up to hand recount.
Mon Nov 28, 2016, 10:47 PM
Nov 2016

Machine counting would require reprogramming the machines. That would be far more risky.

It's also part of the reason, given that it is more efficient, why the BOE not requiring a hand recount is a bit suspicious. Considering time is of the essence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Good News from Wisconsin ...»Reply #10