Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)

2. Nah!

Reply to Yavin4 (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:04 PM

Nov 2016

It just means your big contributors have to suck up load of yax dollars, then leave the public holding the empty bag. Unless, as a final insult, they shit in the bag, so it's not empty.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When you "privatize" something, doesn't that mean that you have to show a profit? [View all] Yavin4 Nov 2016 OP

sometimes a guaranteed profit KT2000 Nov 2016 #1

Nah! HassleCat Nov 2016 #2

Reduce Services - Raise Prices..... global1 Nov 2016 #3

Nope, just that the service is run not by a public entity. mwooldri Nov 2016 #4

"privatizing" is a manipulative word used to make people think of free enterprise. unblock Nov 2016 #5

If an endeavor shows a profit, they take the credit. lpbk2713 Nov 2016 #6

i pay more for medicare part b and c because DesertFlower Nov 2016 #7