Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. I get what you are saying, but up until 2005 Medicare didn't even cover Granny's meds unless
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 07:26 PM
Nov 2016

it could only be injected. george war bush did two things worthwhile in his 8 years, and one was sign the Medicare Part D that began paying for most drugs. Yes, that legislation has flaws, but it greatly improved Medicare in an era when a drug can cure a disease and, at the same time, save a lot of money in hospital and rehab costs.

If Democrats hold the line, GOPers won't be able hurt Medicare. And as crazy as it sounds, I think they might even be able to improve some things in their idiocy. Truthfully, the program has been privatized since inception, and particularly since 1998 with the enactment of Medicare Advantage Plans and a lot of Medicare beneficiaries prefer them to traditional Medicare.

I'd much rather Clinton be leading the change, but I'm going to think positive. What I have seen so far from Ryan is suspect, but it is not abolishing Medicare. GOPers recognized change was necessary under Obama, they just were not going to give him the satisfaction of signing it.

Trying to be positive and not an automatic obstructionists like GOPers have been for the last 8 years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

thank you for posting this jodymarie aimee Nov 2016 #1
Why do the repugs think they'll survive this? As soon as granny is refused her meds lindysalsagal Nov 2016 #2
I get what you are saying, but up until 2005 Medicare didn't even cover Granny's meds unless Hoyt Nov 2016 #5
I would bet my car that people will be far worse off on many fronts. lindysalsagal Nov 2016 #6
It would be foolish to argue considering GOPers. All I can tell you is the seniors were going Hoyt Nov 2016 #8
The reason Medicare Advantage works is the feds fund it Hamlette Nov 2016 #9
I had a Medicare Advantage Plan before I got a job with good benefits, never touched a deductible. Hoyt Nov 2016 #24
Of course that's what they will say. pangaia Nov 2016 #21
Pierce is, as always, right on mcar Nov 2016 #3
That's kind of his point melody Nov 2016 #4
The damage it would do to republicans loyalsister Nov 2016 #7
They mess with Medicare, SS, the VA, national parks, to name but a few, duffyduff Nov 2016 #13
I am sorry to disagerr. pangaia Nov 2016 #22
We'll See colsohlibgal Nov 2016 #10
Older people voted for him SHRED Nov 2016 #11
We can't EVER underestimate the STUPIDITY of the American public. BigDemVoter Nov 2016 #12
They won't get away with this. There are major organizations ready to shoot this shit down. n/t duffyduff Nov 2016 #14
With what? leftofcool Nov 2016 #16
What is your point? Do you think the GOP will actually do this? duffyduff Nov 2016 #17
YES I DO .. And too many fake dems will go along with it.. pangaia Nov 2016 #23
Do you have the slightest clue about how the NC GOP... SMC22307 Nov 2016 #31
Ding! Ding! Ding! ThoughtCriminal Nov 2016 #20
so... djsunyc Nov 2016 #15
It is holiday break. This shit will be shot down in short order. duffyduff Nov 2016 #18
My prediction on how they are going to try it n2doc Nov 2016 #19
They will bury it in a budget bill ... aggiesal Nov 2016 #26
Prepare for the worst! world wide wally Nov 2016 #25
KnR Hekate Nov 2016 #27
My First Post Tetunot Nov 2016 #28
Welcome to DU, Tetunot. SMC22307 Nov 2016 #30
Welcome to DU wryter2000 Nov 2016 #32
EVERY Dem in Congress better join Bernie... SMC22307 Nov 2016 #29
I'll be on the phone with my Senators wryter2000 Nov 2016 #33
Lucky you! SMC22307 Nov 2016 #34
I know I'm blessed wryter2000 Dec 2016 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles P. Pierce: Paul R...»Reply #5