Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wisconsin Election Officials CAN'T ADD: 3.5 Million recount now 3.9 million due to adding error [View all]Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)9. exactly
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wisconsin Election Officials CAN'T ADD: 3.5 Million recount now 3.9 million due to adding error [View all]
Land Shark
Nov 2016
OP
Fwiw Bush v Gore was ruled as a case not to have precedence on anything else.
Tiggeroshii
Nov 2016
#1
largest county population is 947,735 TOTAL, rest are about 20k-40k TOTAL.less than half are voters.
Sunlei
Nov 2016
#2
i think your math is off by a factor of 10. hand counts are totally doable; what do you think
TheFrenchRazor
Nov 2016
#42
wow, how did they ever count votes before computers? guess it's impossible. not. nt
TheFrenchRazor
Dec 2016
#47
okay, 50 people or so; i still don't think that adds up to costing $4M. nt
TheFrenchRazor
Dec 2016
#48
yeah,I did 'exaggerate' a little bit, this was back in the days when I'd do almost any job for cash
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#53
The linked article shows Clinton campaign saying full hand count is required. Nt
Land Shark
Dec 2016
#45
If they're this bad with math, we obviously can't trust them to count votes. Nt
gollygee
Nov 2016
#6
My big question is why did it cost over 500,000 to do a crony judge of the Koch's
turbinetree
Nov 2016
#8
Like the saying goes from Apollo 13: Houston we have a problem in wisCONsin
turbinetree
Nov 2016
#38
Each county submitted an estimate and the state inaccurately tallied the estimates
Land Shark
Dec 2016
#46
Too bad they can't just give us all a number that we can keep private and then put
Maraya1969
Nov 2016
#17
How would it allow vote selling? I was thinking you would get the number right before
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#55
Whenever you confirm your vote in the proper column the vote buyer can confirm also
Land Shark
Dec 2016
#56
Creating grounds for later appeal? In case they don't like how things turn out, technicality ....
Coyotl
Nov 2016
#18
I've never been worried about the money. It only bothers me that the path to the recount
anamandujano
Nov 2016
#30