Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)President Obama Says Marijuana Should Be Treated Like Alcohol [View all]
In a just published exit interview with Rolling Stone Magazine, President Barack Obama opined that marijuana use should be treated as a public-health issue, not a criminal matter, and called the current patchwork of state and federal laws regarding the drug untenable.
Look, Ive been very clear about my belief that we should try to discourage substance abuse, Obama said. And I am not somebody who believes that legalization is a panacea. But I do believe that treating this as a public-health issue, the same way we do with cigarettes or alcohol, is the much smarter way to deal with it.
He added, It is untenable over the long term for the Justice Department or the DEA to be enforcing a patchwork of laws, where something thats legal in one state could get you a 20-year prison sentence in another. So this is a debate that is now ripe, much in the same way that we ended up making progress on same-sex marriage.
http://blog.norml.org/2016/12/01/president-obama-says-marijuana-should-be-treated-like-alcohol/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=President+Obama+Says+Marijuana+Should+Be+Treated+Like+Alcohol
Look, Ive been very clear about my belief that we should try to discourage substance abuse, Obama said. And I am not somebody who believes that legalization is a panacea. But I do believe that treating this as a public-health issue, the same way we do with cigarettes or alcohol, is the much smarter way to deal with it.
He added, It is untenable over the long term for the Justice Department or the DEA to be enforcing a patchwork of laws, where something thats legal in one state could get you a 20-year prison sentence in another. So this is a debate that is now ripe, much in the same way that we ended up making progress on same-sex marriage.
edited to show link to Rolling Stone interview, which is excellent read:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/obama-on-his-legacy-trumps-win-and-the-path-forward-w452527
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I was thinking the same thing. The scheduling of marijuana has been an issue throughout his
Dustlawyer
Dec 2016
#58
He leaves the room in those "comfortable shoes" he promised to walk picket lines wearing.
TonyPDX
Dec 2016
#46
Gonna be hard to do unless or until there is an on site test for driving under the influence.
Tikki
Dec 2016
#10
Would be interesting to see how the Western states are handling the driving issue.
dixiegrrrrl
Dec 2016
#11
Oh, bullshit. Legalization is working fine and there isn't any increase in any of those.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#13
People have been drinking alcohol forever...and people are injured, and killed in accidents...
Tikki
Dec 2016
#18
Funny, I've heard over and over the message "don't drive under the influence"
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#20
I, also, had a relative killed by a drunk driver. My S-I-L. The poster you posted was not...
Tikki
Dec 2016
#24
You might do better with one specific to California. That is part of Oregon's legalization regime.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#28
Thank you...I am all about the driving, I have never been against someone hanging out with MJ.
Tikki
Dec 2016
#31
I can tell you, as someone who lives in a place with up and running recreational legalization
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#32
Also, measure 64 (California) specifically allocates tax revenue towards that specific end.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#29
Its funny how people invested in these scare tactics treat it like some vague hypothetical
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#15
This means the Republicans will be screaming for enforcement in 'legal' states
Strelnikov_
Dec 2016
#17
He could deschedule it entirely, of course... and Trump could reverse it on day one.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#23
I don't think the political calculus for reversing a last minute descheduling is all that different
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#35
49 days left of his presidency and now. He's been one of the most anti-Pot presidents in memory
Feeling the Bern
Dec 2016
#25
"one of the most anti-Pot presidents in memory"- that's an absurd allegation.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#30
Umm. . .no. Put the Kool Aid down. here are seven sources to prove you're wrong.
Feeling the Bern
Dec 2016
#36
You believe your kool aid. I'll believe my eyes. Thank you for playing.
Feeling the Bern
Dec 2016
#38
With all the money to be made by businesses though profit and governments through taxation
Dark n Stormy Knight
Dec 2016
#39
There are many arguments to be made that rescheduling wouldn't help and might hurt. Descheduling
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#62
It should be treated as a freedom of choice issue. There are lots of responsible users.
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2016
#66