Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pelosi is not responsible for house democrats getting elected (or not) [View all]Tatiana
(14,167 posts)24. I think she sees her role as more than managing legislation. She likes the perceived power.
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi promised Wednesday that when her party takes over, the new majority will not attempt to remove President Bush from office, despite earlier pledges to the contrary from others in the caucus.
I have said it before and I will say it again: Impeachment is off the table, Pelosi, D-Calif., said during a news conference.
Pelosi also said Democrats, despite complaining about years of unfair treatment by the majority GOP, are not about getting even with Republicans.
http://www.nytimes.com/cq/2006/11/08/cq_1916.html
I have said it before and I will say it again: Impeachment is off the table, Pelosi, D-Calif., said during a news conference.
Pelosi also said Democrats, despite complaining about years of unfair treatment by the majority GOP, are not about getting even with Republicans.
http://www.nytimes.com/cq/2006/11/08/cq_1916.html
JOY BEHAR: Youve ruled against impeaching George Bush and Dick Cheney, and now Kucinich is trying to pass that. Why do you insist on not impeaching these people, so that the world and America can really see the crimes that theyve committed?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: Well, I think that it I think it was important, when I became Speaker and its, by the way, a very important position President, Vice President, Speaker of the House I saw it as my responsibility to try to bring a much divided country together to the extent that we could. I thought that impeachment would be divisive for the country.
In terms of what we wanted set out to do, we wanted to raise the minimum wage, give the biggest increase in veterans benefits to veterans in the seventy-seven-year history, then pass research for stem cell research, all of that. This week, were going to pass equal pay for equal work. It has been a long time in coming pay equity. Were going to pass legislations for product safety, for toys that children put in their theres an agenda that you have to get done. You have to try to do it in a bipartisan way. The President has to sign it. If somebody had a crime that the President had committed, that would be a different story.
https://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/30/house_speaker_nancy_pelosi_defends_her
REP. NANCY PELOSI: Well, I think that it I think it was important, when I became Speaker and its, by the way, a very important position President, Vice President, Speaker of the House I saw it as my responsibility to try to bring a much divided country together to the extent that we could. I thought that impeachment would be divisive for the country.
In terms of what we wanted set out to do, we wanted to raise the minimum wage, give the biggest increase in veterans benefits to veterans in the seventy-seven-year history, then pass research for stem cell research, all of that. This week, were going to pass equal pay for equal work. It has been a long time in coming pay equity. Were going to pass legislations for product safety, for toys that children put in their theres an agenda that you have to get done. You have to try to do it in a bipartisan way. The President has to sign it. If somebody had a crime that the President had committed, that would be a different story.
https://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/30/house_speaker_nancy_pelosi_defends_her
There is nothing in her demeanor or past actions that indicates she has the skill set and willingness to lead a vigorous and much-needed opposition to the pResident-elect. She is going to be the de-facto face of the Democratic party, along with Chuck Shumer and she's not a very inspiring one, to be honest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pelosi is not responsible for house democrats getting elected (or not) [View all]
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
OP
She has exactly zero role to play in the next two years--she's irrelevant as House Minority
geek tragedy
Dec 2016
#3
Agreed. For me, the big shock was that she held onto the leadership after 2010.
Midwestern Democrat
Dec 2016
#33
I don't hate her either. But she doesn't thrill me, either. We need more who can thrill.
randome
Dec 2016
#16
Unfair it is for both Clinton and Pelosi. But Clinton lost so obviously their tactics worked.
randome
Dec 2016
#17
I gave her the benefit of the doubt then. But it's clear we need new faces in the party.
randome
Dec 2016
#19
Ummm...strangely bizarre downplaying of Pelosi's power and influence over the caucus...
tritsofme
Dec 2016
#23
I was wrong, prior to today, the DCCC chair was a position handpicked by Pelosi.
tritsofme
Dec 2016
#28
I think she sees her role as more than managing legislation. She likes the perceived power.
Tatiana
Dec 2016
#24
Thanks, Lioness. It's really disheartening to find this level of ignorance here...
Hekate
Dec 2016
#30