Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Pantagruel

(2,580 posts)
43. The difference was pre-ordained well before the voting
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 11:53 AM
Dec 2016

May 2016

"Study Finds Republican Voter Suppression Is Even More Effective Than You Think

For years, researchers warned that laws requiring voters to show certain forms of photo identification at the poll would discriminate against racial minorities and other groups. Now, the first study has been released showing that the proliferation of voter ID laws in recent years has indeed driven down minority voter turnout, and by a significant amount.

In a new paper entitled “Voter Identification Laws and the Suppression of Minority Votes”, researchers at the University of California, San Diego — Zoltan Hajnal, Nazita Lajevardi — and Bucknell University — Lindsay Nielson — used data from the annual Cooperative Congressional Election Study to compare states with strict voter ID laws to those that allow voters without photo ID to cast a ballot. They found a clear and significant dampening effect on minority turnout in strict voter ID states.

For example, the researchers found that in primary elections, “a strict ID law could be expected to depress Latino turnout by 9.3 points, Black turnout by 8.6 points, and Asian American turnout by 12.5 points.”

The impact of strict voter ID was also evident in general elections, where minority turnout plummeted in relation to the white vote. “For Latinos in the general election, the predicted gap more than doubles from 4.9 points in states without strict ID laws to 13.5 points in states with strict photo ID laws,” the study found. That gap increased by 2.2 points for African Americans and by 5 points for Asian Americans. The effect was even more pronounced in primary elections. "



5-16-16

"Former aide: GOP lawmakers privately touted voter ID as helping them win elections

State Sen. Mary Lazich, urging fellow Republican senators to enact a voter ID requirement in a closed-door meeting in 2011, told her colleagues to consider its impact in the Democratic strongholds of Milwaukee and the state’s college campuses, a top aide to a former GOP senator testified in federal court Monday.

Congressman Glenn Grothman, serving at that time as a state senator, said in the same meeting that he supported voter ID because it would help Republicans win elections, according to the aide, Todd Allbaugh.

Other Republican lawmakers in the meeting appeared “giddy” at those prospects, Allbaugh testified. At the time of the meeting, he was chief of staff to then-Sen. Dale Schultz, R-Richland Center.

“What I’m concerned about here is winning,” Grothman, of Campbellsport, told his GOP colleagues, Allbaugh said."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If he is successful in delaying Farmgirl1961 Dec 2016 #1
Stein DOES have standing - she was one of the candidates on the ballot. George II Dec 2016 #17
The Irony of her 1 percent humbled_opinion Dec 2016 #31
Of course he is! If he was confident that he won fair and square... Raster Dec 2016 #2
Ya think? ooky Dec 2016 #27
of course he is hiding something bdamomma Dec 2016 #42
It scares me how much I hate him. 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2016 #3
It scares me to. MFM008 Dec 2016 #11
Ditto. He's even starting to make my Reagan hatred look tame. 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2016 #25
That is what scares me the most also. Doreen Dec 2016 #32
It scares me three meow2u3 Dec 2016 #29
yep! Seriously. Trump has just an extra huge helping of "ick" about him Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #33
Why? Whats the poor cry baby got to worry about? Little Star Dec 2016 #4
Public hearing is tomorrow! Barack_America Dec 2016 #5
Convince the Electors Pantagruel Dec 2016 #6
The difference was pre-ordained well before the voting Pantagruel Dec 2016 #43
He Knows Or Suspects The Truth colsohlibgal Dec 2016 #7
Why? HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #8
"brain surgeons" -- Is that a reference to Mental Ben? keithbvadu2 Dec 2016 #13
drumpfuck said 2 million illegals voted.. of course there should Cha Dec 2016 #9
Question about the recount: MichMary Dec 2016 #10
Possible actions by ordinary people ... Aimee in OKC Dec 2016 #19
I think if even one state was to flip drray23 Dec 2016 #26
You know the supreme court doesn't have the power to do that right? texasmomof3 Dec 2016 #35
Its simply a matter for somebody with standing to bring a lawsuit. drray23 Dec 2016 #37
Guess this means... Dopers_Greed Dec 2016 #12
There go the lawsuits again ailsagirl Dec 2016 #14
After his claims of MILLIONS of rigged votes in Hillary's favor, you'd think he'd be all about it gollygee Dec 2016 #15
they've got to lower expectations to expose who is rigging the vote SleeplessinSoCal Dec 2016 #16
How about a letter from Stein's lawyers quoting Donald's insistance that the election is RIGGED? TrollBuster9090 Dec 2016 #18
What, he knows he's a loser? lonestarnot Dec 2016 #20
They're seriously citing Twitter in their objection? ET Awful Dec 2016 #21
He knows the information that is about to be revealed from the recount cannot be covered by his lonestarnot Dec 2016 #22
He should want to know if the election was fair. wisteria Dec 2016 #23
KNR Thank you! Lucinda Dec 2016 #24
Can't have it both ways Don. Ford_Prefect Dec 2016 #28
Well neither can Hillary.... texasmomof3 Dec 2016 #36
Establishment Dems told us the same story in 2000 and ever since. That doesn't make it true. Ford_Prefect Dec 2016 #40
Don is saying the election is rigged, but opposes a recount. That's not what Hillary is saying. (nt) ehrnst Dec 2016 #41
I believe Hillary actually won these 3 states womanofthehills Dec 2016 #30
b4 the recount starts he already lost 30% of his margin 0rganism Dec 2016 #34
Can't jeopardize his "mandate" because it's not based on votes, just on everybody loving him. JudyM Dec 2016 #38
certainly is suspicious how these "honest mistakes" always favor repubs. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump is Trying to Stop t...»Reply #43