Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
64. Families and people's lives have been torn apart because of alcohol.
Sun Dec 4, 2016, 06:30 AM
Dec 2016

I've never in my 61 years seen anyone become abusive to themselves or loved ones because of the use of marijuana. Also, people do not need to go to rehab hospitals to detox from the use of marijuana. It's such a load of hypocrisy from the very ignorant in this country.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GREAT.. Now, pangaia Dec 2016 #1
Executive Order NOW! Lint Head Dec 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Hekate Dec 2016 #6
i'm pretty sure he really can do that by executive order too Amishman Dec 2016 #27
I suspect Trump would just undo it as the current laws on the books help cstanleytech Dec 2016 #59
Probably so. Or more than likely. Lint Head Dec 2016 #60
Except that... SHRED Dec 2016 #3
Well....Ya See..... SoCalMusicLover Dec 2016 #9
He could reschedule it today. n/t Qutzupalotl Dec 2016 #4
Yeah, He Really Did A Lot On That In His 8 Years SoCalMusicLover Dec 2016 #5
Sarcasm noted SHRED Dec 2016 #7
I was thinking the same thing. The scheduling of marijuana has been an issue throughout his Dustlawyer Dec 2016 #58
Interesting Calculating Dec 2016 #8
He could make it schedule 2, today. With a stroke of his pen. AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #16
He does talk a good game though Leontius Dec 2016 #45
He leaves the room in those "comfortable shoes" he promised to walk picket lines wearing. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #46
+1 SammyWinstonJack Dec 2016 #63
Gonna be hard to do unless or until there is an on site test for driving under the influence. Tikki Dec 2016 #10
Would be interesting to see how the Western states are handling the driving issue. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2016 #11
Money over peoples' accidents, injury or death. Tikki Dec 2016 #12
Oh, bullshit. Legalization is working fine and there isn't any increase in any of those. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #13
This Calculating Dec 2016 #14
People have been drinking alcohol forever...and people are injured, and killed in accidents... Tikki Dec 2016 #18
Funny, I've heard over and over the message "don't drive under the influence" Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #20
I, also, had a relative killed by a drunk driver. My S-I-L. The poster you posted was not... Tikki Dec 2016 #24
You might do better with one specific to California. That is part of Oregon's legalization regime. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #28
Thank you...I am all about the driving, I have never been against someone hanging out with MJ. Tikki Dec 2016 #31
I can tell you, as someone who lives in a place with up and running recreational legalization Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #32
Also, measure 64 (California) specifically allocates tax revenue towards that specific end. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #29
Families and people's lives have been torn apart because of alcohol. YOHABLO Dec 2016 #64
Its funny how people invested in these scare tactics treat it like some vague hypothetical Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #15
A rich feller in Delray Beach, FL tom_kelly Dec 2016 #22
That's already illegal gollygee Dec 2016 #40
This means the Republicans will be screaming for enforcement in 'legal' states Strelnikov_ Dec 2016 #17
Gee, that's just swell. Gonna do anything about it? progressoid Dec 2016 #19
Ummmm the Controlled Substance Act gives the executive branch this power... RAFisher Dec 2016 #21
He could deschedule it entirely, of course... and Trump could reverse it on day one. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #23
But would Trump do so? Calculating Dec 2016 #33
I don't think the political calculus for reversing a last minute descheduling is all that different Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #35
49 days left of his presidency and now. He's been one of the most anti-Pot presidents in memory Feeling the Bern Dec 2016 #25
"one of the most anti-Pot presidents in memory"- that's an absurd allegation. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #30
Umm. . .no. Put the Kool Aid down. here are seven sources to prove you're wrong. Feeling the Bern Dec 2016 #36
You will note, most of those are prior to 2013 and the Cole Memo. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #37
You believe your kool aid. I'll believe my eyes. Thank you for playing. Feeling the Bern Dec 2016 #38
Sorry, but it's a discussion board. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #41
Or you just block the person who lowered this into insults. Bye. Feeling the Bern Dec 2016 #56
Sure, that's another option. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #57
Good for him! Warpy Dec 2016 #26
I just wish awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #34
With all the money to be made by businesses though profit and governments through taxation Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2016 #39
I'm gonna miss this guy. I actually think this issue may have been TuslaUltra Dec 2016 #42
I do too. blue cat Dec 2016 #43
I think he butted heads with some serious institutional inertia Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #44
maybe tell that to incoming AG Sessions? 0rganism Dec 2016 #47
He reminds me of Elmer Fudd .. on the redneck side. YOHABLO Dec 2016 #49
Tell keebler Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #50
All I can say is DUH! YOHABLO Dec 2016 #48
On his way out the door? Abq_Sarah Dec 2016 #51
Ohhhhh, Barry, WHY didn't you make this decision a year ago? napi21 Dec 2016 #52
Why is he saying this now? Internationalist Dec 2016 #53
I always treat my blunt with a beer chaser😎 benld74 Dec 2016 #54
He's right. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #55
Then do something before leaving office! IronLionZion Dec 2016 #61
There are many arguments to be made that rescheduling wouldn't help and might hurt. Descheduling Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #62
There's only one way to find out for sure IronLionZion Dec 2016 #65
You're right about that. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #67
It should be treated as a freedom of choice issue. There are lots of responsible users. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2016 #66
Probably said above: we're all going to need plenty of marijuana once Trump takes over. C Moon Dec 2016 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama Says Mari...»Reply #64