Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
K&R... spanone Dec 2016 #1
While I don't expect the recounts to change anything.... LisaM Dec 2016 #2
The corruption of democracy continues apace. How can we trust elections after this one? Coyotl Dec 2016 #3
Good question Coyotl Land Shark Dec 2016 #5
This graph should not be ignored. Cracklin Charlie Dec 2016 #7
Great way to visualize some of the evidence. Land Shark Dec 2016 #13
And the states w/o Senate races have half the 2016 red shift! Coyotl Dec 2016 #14
Very pursuasive, we need beyond reasonable doubt, which may or may not be prohibited from discovery. lonestarnot Dec 2016 #18
Election officials can't prove a legal election occurred at any level of proof Land Shark Dec 2016 #30
Figures...the lying scumbags run to Bush v Gore for cover. roamer65 Dec 2016 #4
Yeah they want to keep options open to rule the opposite if shoe on other foot. Nt Land Shark Dec 2016 #9
so nice to see you posting landshark. mopinko Dec 2016 #6
Thanks mopinko! Nt Land Shark Dec 2016 #8
Really? Bush V. Gore was not supposed to set a precedent (SCOTUS own statement) McCamy Taylor Dec 2016 #10
Please read the OP, not being a precedent only makes it worse Land Shark Dec 2016 #15
Bad Memories colsohlibgal Dec 2016 #11
K&R bdamomma Dec 2016 #12
Recounts are a threat moondust Dec 2016 #16
Yammering Yam doesn't want to be put on display for his cheat. lonestarnot Dec 2016 #17
The GOP is hiding something. Tricks they've been using for the past 15 years. C Moon Dec 2016 #19
Bush v Gore itself states it does not set a precedent, and is limited to that case. LS_Editor Dec 2016 #20
Not being precedent (if true) only means that same case could be decided either way next time Land Shark Dec 2016 #24
There is another alternative. Automatic partial recounts of a random sample pnwmom Dec 2016 #21
question. barbtries Dec 2016 #22
See #24. It hardly matters what they said if cases are factually quite similar. Land Shark Dec 2016 #25
well it's moot this election barbtries Dec 2016 #28
Land Shark! I remember your great posts from the dark days of the 2004 theft MadLinguist Dec 2016 #23
Thanks much, well, we see each other when there is common cause. :) Land Shark Dec 2016 #26
K&R red dog 1 Dec 2016 #27
Larry Tribe has, however, since said no jurisdiction for Bush v Gore ( political question doctrine) Land Shark Dec 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump forces file Bush v ...»Reply #8