Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RandySF

(82,346 posts)
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 12:49 AM Dec 2011

The win-win of a Obama-Hillary ticket. [View all]

I was very much involved in the Obama side 2008 primary wars, but I never lost my respect for the intellect and hard work of the former New York senator and First Lady. What's more, she is an outstanding Secretary of State. I've followed Joe Biden's career as long as I followed politics, from his first run for president to his tenure as Vice President. I will also be forever grateful that he kept Robert Bork off the Supreme Court. Nothing but respect for the kid from Scranton. But we are heading into a potentially tough presidential campaign and an increasingly perilous time on the world stage. A shuffling of seats might be needed to Joe and Hillary's strengths. Here are the pluses and minuses of a trade in positions for Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton.

Pluses.
1. Hillary on the ticket could bring in a lot of white, working class voters who voted for her in the 2008 primaries, voted for Obama and might either sit home or vote Republican in 2012.
2. Obama can send her to parts of the country where he might not be as welcome (parts of Ohio, Pennsylvania and other states).
3. Hillary's place guarantees that the Big Dog will go out to campaign for the ticket, raise money for the DNC and mobilize local Democratic organizers in key states.
4. Clinton fundraisers will be more inclined to raise cash for the party.
5. Joe Biden will have an opportunity to leave a lasting, tangible legacy as Secretary of State.
6. Biden's tenure on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will make him well-suited to handle issues facing the Middle East and South Asia.

Minuses:
1. Requires total buy-in from Biden. He is not the kind of guy to hide any unhappiness.
2. Could be seen as a desperate move by the MSM.


41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Please drop it. elleng Dec 2011 #1
Why? The OP has clearly put a lot of thought into this. Nye Bevan Dec 2011 #3
I agree its a discussion board, elleng Dec 2011 #5
I think it is probably a done deal, and I don't think that Joe Biden is very JDPriestly Dec 2011 #19
I don't know. I don't know that it is the BEST idea. But I don't hate it either. musicblind Dec 2011 #9
Give it up Warpy Dec 2011 #2
When she ran for the Senate from NY customerserviceguy Dec 2011 #28
Personally, I don't like to see the same surnames on the presidential ticket shraby Dec 2011 #4
When did the Clintons do that? n/t Control-Z Dec 2011 #13
We had a Bill Clinton for president, we had Hilary Clinton as a presidential candidate. shraby Dec 2011 #32
So, really, it never happened. Control-Z Dec 2011 #38
Clinton as VP and Biden as SoS would be nice, but boxman15 Dec 2011 #6
President Obama has already asked Biden to run with him in 2012 and Joe said: YES. Tx4obama Dec 2011 #7
Good. Tx4Obama. JDPriestly Dec 2011 #20
Maybe the recent Gallup 'most admired' poll has spurred on the VP talk (?) Tx4obama Dec 2011 #21
please be careful what you wish for. thoughts have momentum. marasinghe Dec 2011 #8
Obama asked Biden MONTHS ago. Biden accepted. What is the problem with this? CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #10
Not going to happen. MjolnirTime Dec 2011 #11
The win-win of Hide Thread. A-Schwarzenegger Dec 2011 #12
DUzy grantcart Dec 2011 #15
Trying to get in right under the wire for "Goofiest idea of 2011", apparently Warren DeMontague Dec 2011 #14
I doubt Hillary would go for this but at the same time quinnox Dec 2011 #16
I prefer Joe to Hillary. JDPriestly Dec 2011 #17
It will not happen because she does not want it. MADem Dec 2011 #18
Btw, there is a Joe Biden group here on DU3 - link below :) Tx4obama Dec 2011 #22
Thanks for pointing it out, Tx4! elleng Dec 2011 #29
No. n/t ellisonz Dec 2011 #23
Russ Feingold would be better, imo. RainDog Dec 2011 #24
We already have a ticket. bowens43 Dec 2011 #25
Why would it make such a big difference? treestar Dec 2011 #26
Hillary Clinton got over 18 million votes. juajen Dec 2011 #36
I'm a woman and I'm not that angry treestar Dec 2011 #37
"Hillary fanatics" are half of the party or did you choose to forget that point? Beacool Dec 2011 #41
I think if Obama were going to pick a new VP (which he isn't) justiceischeap Dec 2011 #27
New rule: ProSense Dec 2011 #30
You are right and it is a legitimate topic for discussion cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #31
The effort to divide Democrats and depress Dem turnout continues .... JoePhilly Dec 2011 #33
who starts this kind of nonsense? Whisp Dec 2011 #34
Sorry, all the reasons she was not picked the first time around still exist Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #35
Share what you are smoking rustydog Dec 2011 #39
I guess the Clinton folks never really got over it did they? DefenseLawyer Dec 2011 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The win-win of a Obama-Hi...