Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(731 posts)

11. I don't understand either

Wed Jun 20, 2012, 12:27 PM

Jun 2012

Why would he cover for BUSH? I really hope this isn't the next watergate, but i smell foul play

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The President is correct in using Executive Privilege... [View all] slor Jun 2012 OP

correct. effyounow Jun 2012 #1

But wouldn't those docs prove it started with Bush? B2G Jun 2012 #2

That's why I don't understand them not coming clean from the start TBMASE Jun 2012 #4

I don't understand either MrDiaz Jun 2012 #11

but they didn't try to end it. magical thyme Jun 2012 #13

The problem was Holder's initial testimony turned out to be untrue TBMASE Jun 2012 #3

You are correct, however none of your... slor Jun 2012 #5

I'm not saying they should be excluded TBMASE Jun 2012 #6

No. He should have asserted priviledge from the start TBMASE Jun 2012 #9

Disagree ThomasP Jun 2012 #12

Bullshit LibAsHell Jun 2012 #14

Disagree. emilyg Jun 2012 #15