Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,903 posts)
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 12:48 PM Dec 2016

CEO of United Technologies just let slip an unintended consequence of the Trump-Carrier jobs deal [View all]

The ultimate outcome of the deal: There will be fewer manufacturing jobs in Indiana.


here's the kicker

The result of keeping the plant in Indiana open is a $16 million investment to drive down the cost of production, so as to reduce the cost gap with operating in Mexico.

What does that mean? Automation. What does that mean? Fewer jobs, Hayes acknowledged.

From the transcript (emphasis added):

GREG HAYES: Right. Well, and again, if you think about what we talked about last week, we're going to make a $16 million investment in that factory in Indianapolis to automate to drive the cost down so that we can continue to be competitive. Now is it as cheap as moving to Mexico with lower cost of labor? No. But we will make that plant competitive just because we'll make the capital investments there.

JIM CRAMER: Right.

GREG HAYES: But what that ultimately means is there will be fewer jobs.





MORE:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ceo-united-technologies-just-let-231538059.html
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And they got $7 million to get things started. dhol82 Dec 2016 #1
The Repubbies & Corporate Media lap Trump's BS up without question Achilleaze Dec 2016 #2
The door is kicked open for the next four years Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #4
"Unintended?" Doubtful....nt Wounded Bear Dec 2016 #3
Of course robots / machines will take work BSdetect Dec 2016 #5
But it was a hell of a good photo op. Vinca Dec 2016 #6
Every political platform that runs on jobs for people is going SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #7
The "buggy whip" thing was bullshit anyway jmowreader Dec 2016 #12
We're more like the horse this time though SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #24
but we'll keep those robots in America, by God! anarch Dec 2016 #8
Ehh. Automation is ultimately good for the economy. Sucks for those losing their jobs, though. hueymahl Dec 2016 #9
The problem is there is a tipping point where there simply won't be any grantcart Dec 2016 #11
Maybe, maybe not. hueymahl Dec 2016 #17
What would be good for OUR economy is annabanana Dec 2016 #15
Yes, but that is an whole other issue hueymahl Dec 2016 #16
I'm tired of hearing Democrats are against the working class bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #10
Good point hueymahl Dec 2016 #20
Which is fine and all well and good with some validity bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #22
Agreed. We are living in Bizarro World. NT hueymahl Dec 2016 #23
What a surprise: Businesses want cheap labor William Seger Dec 2016 #13
Trump kept robot jobs in the country lame54 Dec 2016 #14
the jobs will be to service and maintain the robots DeminPennswoods Dec 2016 #18
Likely true hueymahl Dec 2016 #21
but hey! those unemployed will still be Americas unemployed Damn it! Javaman Dec 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CEO of United Technologie...