Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Bad Dog

(2,044 posts)
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 07:45 AM Dec 2016

Publishers shy away from Trump satire for fear of being sued. [View all]

Before he's taken office there's a fear of censorship.



Artist Alison Jackson has said that she chose to self-publish spoof photographs of Donald Trump as part of a protest against the potentially chilling effect a “litigious” president could have on artistic freedom.

The celebrity lookalike specialist said she was warned by her lawyers against publishing the images, some of which feature a Trump lookalike in compromising situations, and that no book publisher was prepared to release a collection of the Trump images.

Vanity Fair and the Mail Online have published some of the images. However, no publisher has shown some of the most politically sensitive pictures she has produced, including one in which a Trump character is depicted with members of the Ku Klux Klan and another where he is shown holding a rifle.

All kinds of artistic endeavour, from the cast of the Hamilton musical to Saturday Night Live have also come under fire from Trump directly. Most recently the Saturday Night Live sketch starring Alec Baldwin which imagined the president elect constantly tweeting unknown teenagers and possible bigots while in the middle of a security briefing provoked Trump who tweeted:

"Just tried watching Saturday Night Live - unwatchable! Totally biased, not funny and the Baldwin impersonation just can't get any worse. Sad"


Forced to consider the threat of legal action by her lawyers, who have never given such warnings before, Jackson said she had to fight against self-censorship. “It makes you frightened, it makes you put the brakes on and that is very worrying.”

She admits that she will probably “think very carefully” about future work. “I don’t want to be sued and I really don’t want to be sued by the next US president.”


https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/dec/08/artist-alison-jackson-self-publishes-spoof-trump-photos-despite-fear-of-being-sued
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That's stupid treestar Dec 2016 #1
The first ammendment only applies in America. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #3
still they should be courageous and know treestar Dec 2016 #5
Should they? Bad Dog Dec 2016 #7
The thing to do is get British counsel and find out treestar Dec 2016 #11
A real case? Bad Dog Dec 2016 #15
I don't, that's why I'd need to get an opinion treestar Dec 2016 #20
You don't need to be a lawyer to know Trump lost the case in the UK supreme court. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #24
People should flood the Internet. Vinca Dec 2016 #2
I don't think the 1st ammendment is the panacea you hope it is. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #4
Satire is protected in the US. Dave Starsky Dec 2016 #18
Legal protection doesn't help much when you're faced with mob rule. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #23
This treestar Dec 2016 #6
Didn't work out too well for the Dixie Chicks. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #9
I don't like the idea of accepting that treestar Dec 2016 #10
Did it work out in the long run Bad Dog Dec 2016 #14
I'm not sure where you are coming from treestar Dec 2016 #21
I'm saying it's very easy to tell people to stand up and be counted Bad Dog Dec 2016 #25
What consequence is that? n/t TrekLuver Dec 2016 #12
You've got a short memory. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #16
You said Chuck Jones is facing the consequences - I wasn't talking about the Dixie Chicks TrekLuver Dec 2016 #17
Fair enough. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #22
Yep. EVERYONE has a duty to speak up. AgadorSparticus Dec 2016 #8
That's what I'm saying RonniePudding Dec 2016 #13
that's called intimidating the media...nothing less. spanone Dec 2016 #19
You're right it is. Bad Dog Dec 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Publishers shy away from ...