Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
4. As I said in another thread (in LBN)
Sun Dec 11, 2016, 10:01 PM
Dec 2016

You're right: it's a distinction without a difference, although the motive might be relevant to historians. Assuming our descendants speak English and not Russian, obviously.

14. The circumstancial evidence is completely damning

Did Putin personally autograph Russia's actions? Send a thank you note to Trump? Of course not.

Did Russia hack both the RNC and the DNC, yet only release the DNC emails? Yes. Even the FBI (apparently) believes that.

Do Trump and Company have close personal and financial ties to the Russian government going back decades? Yes.

Did Trump immediately begin nominating entirely pro-Russian cabinet members? Yes.

Have Trump and his people defended Russia -- even threatened to break up NATO -- at every step of the way? Yes.

For any law enforcement agency or prosecutor in the world, this case wouldn't even be close. The only true unknown is the extent of TrumpCo's involvement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CIA Veterans Urge Caution...»Reply #4