General Discussion

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)

44. Would your response be different if I had linked to the NYT article?

Sun Dec 11, 2016, 10:58 PM

Dec 2016

Fortune? The Fiscal Times? All of those links also came up when I did the google. But thanks so much for the education on libertarianism. Totally news to me. Or not.

I said her actions gave rise to questions about her motivations and honesty. That is the fact. Whether she intended to sell out her whole career is moot. I don't understand how she missed the lesson that politics is all about appearances. Her speeches and her stubborn stance not to release them, her carefully-worded position on TPP (not in favor "as written&quot , her stupid server (how easy would it have been, and how much less trouble, to keep work and personal emails SEPARATE?).

Sadly for all of us, her care and caution seemed more focused on protecting her privacy, and not her reputation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Greenwald running cover for Russia? [View all] SHRED Dec 2016 OP

Yes MFM008 Dec 2016 #1

Yeah. He is the third member of the unholy Trinity of Putin apologists and anti - US agit prop. nt Abu Pepe Dec 2016 #2

And apparently Juan Cole sadly SHRED Dec 2016 #3

He's a huge piece of shit onecaliberal Dec 2016 #4

Maybe he should live in Russia? SHRED Dec 2016 #12

He definitely should onecaliberal Dec 2016 #20

Isn't he still in Rio de Janeiro? FarCenter Dec 2016 #23

Greenwald is useless. lapucelle Dec 2016 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author SHRED Dec 2016 #7

Check this out SHRED Dec 2016 #10

Wow. lapucelle Dec 2016 #13

The Nation's Katrina Vandenheuvel retweeted his story flamingdem Dec 2016 #6

Holy shitcan Generator Dec 2016 #9

He didn't like what I told him SHRED Dec 2016 #11

You hit a nerve. He's got to be uncomfortable knowing he was used by Russia. KittyWampus Dec 2016 #32

she is a career leftist JI7 Dec 2016 #17

I don't know but I don't trust him anymore Generator Dec 2016 #8

Thanks for the link. KittyWampus Dec 2016 #31

Greenwald is a complete asshole. Snowden too. gulliver Dec 2016 #14

Your autocorrect snuck a question mark in there for some reason KamaAina Dec 2016 #15

Now that's funny right there SHRED Dec 2016 #16

Anything to smear all Dems from a safe place in South America bettyellen Dec 2016 #18

Greenwood has consistently warned about anonymous govt sources Cicada Dec 2016 #19

No, but he's consistently harder on the US than Russia, pnwmom Dec 2016 #22

The US probably does more bad things than Russia Cicada Dec 2016 #25

WTF? MineralMan Dec 2016 #40

Aren't we harder on those we expect more from? truebluegreen Dec 2016 #26

We often are and that's dumb. That led many progressives pnwmom Dec 2016 #27

Yes, all those people wanting Hillary to commit truebluegreen Dec 2016 #29

All those people guilty of false equivalence. pnwmom Dec 2016 #33

You do understand that our entire government truebluegreen Dec 2016 #35

Hillary did not "profit" from any of the funds given to her charitable foundation. pnwmom Dec 2016 #37

Uh, never said a word about the Foundation truebluegreen Dec 2016 #38

The Intercept is a libertarian site which shouldn't be linked to here, pnwmom Dec 2016 #39

Would your response be different if I had linked to the NYT article? truebluegreen Dec 2016 #44

No, I wouldn't be saying the NYTimes is a libertarian site. pnwmom Dec 2016 #45

You have the google, don't you? truebluegreen Dec 2016 #46

YOU have "the google" and you didn't use it to support your argument. pnwmom Dec 2016 #47

I read it, along with several others. truebluegreen Dec 2016 #48

As if her almost 3 million more popular votes are nothing but chopped liver eleny Dec 2016 #21

Those three million votes are a nice salve for our hurt feelings truebluegreen Dec 2016 #28

I didn't say that those votes were the determining factor eleny Dec 2016 #36

Only for the last 8 years or so...nt SidDithers Dec 2016 #24

He goes on and on about a "lack of evidence", without ONCE asking why that might be the case. BzaDem Dec 2016 #30

Greenwald is just engaging in the old infantile left racket of anti-Americanism Arneoker Dec 2016 #34

I'm with u vs Glen any day UTUSN Dec 2016 #41

And another thing SHRED Dec 2016 #42

Same as with O'Reilly: The choice is for the Little vs the Big - they're always on the Big side UTUSN Dec 2016 #43