General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How many kids are too many? [View all]saras
(6,670 posts)I was one of four kids, each of whom got a distinctly different set of inappropriateness, due to our birth order. In some ways the first got the worst of it, though, the ignorance and rigidity, so more is better there. The rest of us benefited from NOT being the first. Having too many older siblings wasn't good either, as we didn't get along that well. And so on. I'm sure that every dysfunctional family has their own completely distinct version.
But I think the only realistic criteria compatible with liberty and diversity is actual misbehavior or dysfunction on the part of the children, or the parents. I think that if you have thirteen kids, there's probably a lot of 'normal kid experiences' you can't, or don't provide them. How much right to parents have to do that, independent of how many kids they have? How does it affect them?
You can have two, and the second one be so demanding that the first gets neglected. Hell, you can have one, and have a parent get so sick that the kid gets neglected.
I don't get why it's always so tempting to try to prohibit a whole class of people instead of isolating what in that class is the actual problem. Bicycles ride too fast for pedestrians? Don't slow them down, ban them. A few people abusing a drug? Ban it for everyone. A few crazies use a certain kind of gun? Ban the gun. Why not just ban assholicity and be done with it?