Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,225 posts)
45. Consider that she affected the election outcome, with her scathing attacks
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 09:00 PM
Dec 2016

against Hillary throughout.

Consider that she had dinner with Putin at an RT celebration in Russia last winter.

She's not an ally -- of us, anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think it's been mostly about publicity for her, but "the last minute" shouldn't be an excuse to Maru Kitteh Dec 2016 #1
+1, doesn't matter if she waited till the last milisecond... democracy timing in this context uponit7771 Dec 2016 #2
He had a lot more to say than just that. And he says that by waiting pnwmom Dec 2016 #4
Then they should revise the deadline. Maru Kitteh Dec 2016 #6
The judge made that point in combination with others, like this: pnwmom Dec 2016 #7
She didn't meet the deadline. She was asking the judge to overrule the deadline. Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #26
Well, that's entirely different then. The deadline should apply. That was my only point. Maru Kitteh Dec 2016 #29
Up until now I had a somewhat favorable attitude toward her. Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #38
She did not meet the legal requirements for a state-wide recount. Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #25
Her bats left the belfry long ago. I suspect long-term abuse Maru Kitteh Dec 2016 #30
I suspect she feels guilty, because her voters might have cost Hillary PA Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #37
She is a scammer. From beginning to end. nt WhiteTara Dec 2016 #3
At Least She Did Something SoCalMusicLover Dec 2016 #8
Yes, she did something. She scammed WhiteTara Dec 2016 #9
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #10
Please elaborate. WhiteTara Dec 2016 #11
Damn. I missed it. Maru Kitteh Dec 2016 #31
He called Hillary Clinton a scammer. WhiteTara Dec 2016 #32
She scammed people. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #14
She did something for HERSELF, not for us. pnwmom Dec 2016 #16
Yep. I could tell she is a scammer from seeing WhiteTara Dec 2016 #33
Thank you for explaining it all so carefully. Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #39
Yeah, she preyed on people's anxiety TheLibIn615 Dec 2016 #22
Why are you blaming Hillary for not doing the impossible???? Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #27
We're talking Jill Stein, not Hillary Clinton. WhiteTara Dec 2016 #34
I was replying to a post that did blame Hillary Clinton. n/t Yo_Mama Dec 2016 #35
Thanks for defending Hillary. WhiteTara Dec 2016 #36
lol. Stein said there was no difference between trump and Clinton. stein only helped trump and JI7 Dec 2016 #40
why have a deadline at all? Jean-Jacques Roussea Dec 2016 #5
If she made it before the deadline, what's the problem? Baitball Blogger Dec 2016 #12
She didn't make any allegations of hacking. For them to subject the whole state pnwmom Dec 2016 #15
This was a political stunt. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #13
Its a hell of a lot for one person to take on. milestogo Dec 2016 #17
If she was serious about this, she would have met the original filing date pnwmom Dec 2016 #21
I didn't know the Law was so sensitive to filings made ON TIME. KittyWampus Dec 2016 #18
When they also don't contain any allegations of wrong-doing -- yes, pnwmom Dec 2016 #19
I just don't know DesmondFoster Dec 2016 #20
Welcome to DU, DesmondFoster! n/t pnwmom Dec 2016 #23
Thanks! DesmondFoster Dec 2016 #24
She took advantage. Sissyk Dec 2016 #28
Career leftists always want the republicans to win so they can make money JI7 Dec 2016 #41
I am glad we tried on the recount fallrey Dec 2016 #42
I would have been more impressed with her effort, and less suspicious, pnwmom Dec 2016 #43
Consider fallrey Dec 2016 #44
Consider that she affected the election outcome, with her scathing attacks pnwmom Dec 2016 #45
I'm with you on that! fallrey Dec 2016 #47
Ok, one more thought on PA fallrey Dec 2016 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge says Stein "inexcus...»Reply #45