Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
11. Probably not.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 08:50 AM
Jun 2012
Top 1 percent: How much do they earn?
By Kay Bell • Bankrate.com

So just how much do you have to earn to be part of the elite 1 percent?

That depends on whose figures you use.

Based on 2009 tax year filing data, the Internal Revenue Service says an adjusted gross income, or AGI, of $343,927 or more will put you in the top 1 percent of taxpayers.

--clip--

The income thresholds are for the amount of AGI on a return, not per taxpayer.

That means a single filer who made $343,927 or more in 2009 is in the top 1 percentile. A married couple with two kids and combined earnings of $343,927 or more also was among the top earners in the country. The 2009 figures are the latest the IRS has tallied. Filing of returns for tax year 2010 didn't officially close until Oct. 17.

The 1.4 million Americans in the IRS' top taxpayer category in 2009 reported nearly 17 percent of all the country's taxable income. From those filers, the IRS collected $318 billion or almost 37 percent of all the individual taxes paid in 2009.

Read more: Top 1 Percent: How Much Do They Earn? | Bankrate.com http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/top-1-percent-earn.aspx#ixzz1yR32LbcL


$350,000 x 1.4 million is only $490 billion

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Jun 2012 #1
another day, another one (or two) of these posts CreekDog Jun 2012 #2
Shouldn't people know the amounts? dkf Jun 2012 #3
Yes, but what next? Zalatix Jun 2012 #4
Has to be addressed state by state. dkf Jun 2012 #5
Another day, more personal attacks. pintobean Jun 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Jun 2012 #13
Roon's imaginary picket line crossings? pintobean Jun 2012 #15
you came here to post against me, not the other way around CreekDog Jun 2012 #17
I knew you posted your usual crap pintobean Jun 2012 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Jun 2012 #20
Links? It didn't happen anything near pintobean Jun 2012 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Jun 2012 #23
Yeah, you can't. pintobean Jun 2012 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Jun 2012 #25
Just realized something, you posted 5 times here and nothing about the OP CreekDog Jun 2012 #26
Admitting failure. pintobean Jun 2012 #27
no but you'll say anything CreekDog Jun 2012 #28
That didn't last long pintobean Jun 2012 #29
i didn't promise not to respond to you ever CreekDog Jun 2012 #31
And a small increase in the taxes the 1% pay would more than cover this gap liberal N proud Jun 2012 #7
Are you thinking the Federal Govt should cover the State shortfalls? dkf Jun 2012 #8
The tax cuts for the wealthy is not just a federal problem liberal N proud Jun 2012 #9
Yes, the Federal Government should cover the shortfalls. girl gone mad Jun 2012 #16
Yes, the former was recommended by many prominent economists CreekDog Jun 2012 #21
$1.38 trillion is more than a small increase for the 1% alc Jun 2012 #10
Probably not. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #11
Don't confuse the issue with facts badtoworse Jun 2012 #19
Debunking the myth of the over-compensated public employee Lasher Jun 2012 #12
interesting. an article talks about a funding gap & puts up a big number but doesn't tell the HiPointDem Jun 2012 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jun 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The funding gap for U.S. ...»Reply #11