Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(53,429 posts)
23. You have that many charitable contributions?
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 06:17 PM
Dec 2016

The 2016 standard deduction:

Single, Married Filing Separately: $6,300

Married Filing Jointly, Qualifying Surviving Spouse: $12,600

(I had to look: If you have at least one child, you can use the Married Filing Jointly standard deduction for two years after your spouse dies.)

Head of Household: $9,300

This is what you are allowed to deduct:

Medical and Dental Expenses not reimbursed or paid by others, minus 10 percent of your adjusted gross income (AGI)

Taxes you paid: your choice of state income tax or state sales tax, plus real estate taxes, personal property taxes, and "other" taxes

Mortgage costs: home mortgage interest, points paid, mortgage insurance premiums, investment interest

Gifts to charity

Casualty and theft losses

Job expenses and miscellaneous deductions: unreimbursed employee expenses, tax preparation fees, and "other" expenses, minus two percent of your AGI

Then there's an "other miscellaneous deductions" from a list in the Schedule A booklet.

If you earn more than $155,650 there's a worksheet you need to complete to see whether you get to keep all of it.

Here's the problem: In order to have the level of spending needed to use Schedule A, you've got two choices: eat nothing but ramen and live in a darkened house because you can't afford electricity, or earn very close to that $155,650 statutory cutoff.

If General Secretary Trump wants to do something to help the Common Man (stop your laughing), he can quit fucking around with tax rates and allow people to use both the standard deduction and Schedule A if they earn under:

Single/Married Filing Separately: $50,001
Head of Household: $75,001
Married Filing Jointly/Qualified Surviving Spouse: $100,001

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It won't reduce their deduction, right? It'll just give a bigger deduction to others.... bettyellen Dec 2016 #1
Actually...this would help lower income folks. roamer65 Dec 2016 #2
The white folks that voted for Trump don't want to help poor black folks. They want an advantage TeamPooka Dec 2016 #5
At first blush, I'm not sure this is bad policy. tritsofme Dec 2016 #3
If it's a wash, they wouldn't bother. HassleCat Dec 2016 #4
I'm so jaded right now I can't help but side-eye any repub driven ideas Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #6
As you should Cosmocat Dec 2016 #13
That's not what the description says onenote Dec 2016 #8
Never trust the come-on. HassleCat Dec 2016 #26
It's the one deduction Skidmore Dec 2016 #7
We have the charitable contributions deduction onenote Dec 2016 #9
You have that many charitable contributions? jmowreader Dec 2016 #23
They have plans for eliminating that, too. n/t pnwmom Dec 2016 #31
they can't double the standard deduction Mosby Dec 2016 #10
This - bait and switch Cosmocat Dec 2016 #14
Doubling the standard deduction? PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2016 #11
I am on a single mom group HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #16
I'm feeling a bit puzzled, because if the standard deduction is doubled, PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2016 #18
From Forbes, obviously there are plenty of variables HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #20
You're not that old jmowreader Dec 2016 #24
IMO the standard deduction should be increased to the figure treestar Dec 2016 #12
Do people forget 2000? Cosmocat Dec 2016 #15
The mortgage interest tax deduction has always been about the rich. rgbecker Dec 2016 #17
Not all homeowners are rich. PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2016 #19
For sure. But the deduction is benefiting the rich more than anyone. rgbecker Dec 2016 #21
That's true, that it benefits the rich more, PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2016 #22
The red flag in the description is "*existing* mortgages" muriel_volestrangler Dec 2016 #25
First sentence is misleading, "the mortgage-interest deduction would be moot for most Americans " still_one Dec 2016 #27
I didn't read the article. Kang Colby Dec 2016 #28
God damn right Cosmocat Dec 2016 #29
Looking at the replies to this thread, and just about everyone is missing the point. Xolodno Dec 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's a big fight brewi...»Reply #23