General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Rodham Clinton ... [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)And that's the point.
Hillary "lost" because voters in low-populated states are weighted to count for more than one vote. This isn't a "probable factor" - it is THE factor. The ONLY thing that prevented HRC from becoming POTUS IS the EC - there is NO OTHER obstacle standing in the way of the candidate who got the MOST votes from being inaugurated.
You want to "objectively examine" all possible factors? You might try starting with the MOST obvious factor of all: the EC voting against the will of the People.
I am particularly amused by those who didn't support HRC/Dems because they were "too Establishment" now claiming that an antiquated "establishment" system like the EC should take precedence (or presidence) over the clear choice of actual voters.