Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
4. "2-13" major shareholders on the board of directors, if applicable.
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 10:31 AM
Dec 2016

Many in America think "shareholder value" is king and "fiduciary duty" is legally binding. It's actually a corporate CHOICE, not a law.

That's pretty much who Trump is going to care about . . . the major shareholders (i.e. The Wealthy).

Not sure what your clause in the parenthesis means. Would you please expand on it? Kolesar Dec 2016 #1
"2-13" major shareholders on the board of directors, if applicable. HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #4
I wanted a "Bud Light" Kolesar Dec 2016 #7
If you mean this section - HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #14
Aha! Wage deflation for skilled and semiskilled work Kolesar Dec 2016 #16
Gee . . . who was about to be President then? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #18
[x] Like for your post Kolesar Dec 2016 #19
They want to be lied to. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2016 #2
Or if they DO stay/come back Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2016 #9
That's the rub of it SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #3
But.....but.....that's making America less......"exceptional" Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2016 #11
That's not an easy sell for anyone SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #20
Gainfully employed workers buying products and services isn't necessary for Capitalism? HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #15
There's no easy answer to that question SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #21
No. mercuryblues Dec 2016 #5
They voted for him because of the R next to his name Trekologer Dec 2016 #6
[x] Like for your post Kolesar Dec 2016 #8
They see themselves as "one lucky break from BEING Donald Trump" rather than "One missed paycheck smirkymonkey Dec 2016 #10
A small portion of his voters was motivated by economics. The supermajority was motivated by bigotry LonePirate Dec 2016 #12
Maybe that's why "primarily economic" was in quotes. HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #13
Yes a BIG spoonful of LIES with a big helping of RACISM...& Tah-Dah... Good to Go! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did "the economic message...»Reply #4