Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
14. If you mean this section -
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 10:59 AM
Dec 2016
What I'm gathering from all the political/news commentators and comments sections was that they wanted someone to tell them their jobs are returning, their talents are necessary, and there would be no need for them to get additional skills to improve their lives (even though they seem to have no issue telling minimum wage earners this . . . over and over and over and over again).


That's probably my fault for not wording it clearly enough.

It's a common trope for conservative white workers in positions that involve skill (which also come with generally inadequate pay) on any topic that involves raising the minimum wage to tell minimum wage workers to "SUPERSIZE YER SKILL SET HAW HAW HAW", implying they don't deserve $15 an hour for low skill positions.

They never bother INSTEAD to ask themselves

a) why are we still considering $12-14/hr some extravagant wage reserved for higher skilled labor in 2016?
b) why am I NOT earning more for my SKILLED job?
c) why is "McDonalds" now the new "blue collar work"? How did that come to be?
Not sure what your clause in the parenthesis means. Would you please expand on it? Kolesar Dec 2016 #1
"2-13" major shareholders on the board of directors, if applicable. HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #4
I wanted a "Bud Light" Kolesar Dec 2016 #7
If you mean this section - HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #14
Aha! Wage deflation for skilled and semiskilled work Kolesar Dec 2016 #16
Gee . . . who was about to be President then? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #18
[x] Like for your post Kolesar Dec 2016 #19
They want to be lied to. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2016 #2
Or if they DO stay/come back Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2016 #9
That's the rub of it SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #3
But.....but.....that's making America less......"exceptional" Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2016 #11
That's not an easy sell for anyone SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #20
Gainfully employed workers buying products and services isn't necessary for Capitalism? HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #15
There's no easy answer to that question SubjectiveLife78 Dec 2016 #21
No. mercuryblues Dec 2016 #5
They voted for him because of the R next to his name Trekologer Dec 2016 #6
[x] Like for your post Kolesar Dec 2016 #8
They see themselves as "one lucky break from BEING Donald Trump" rather than "One missed paycheck smirkymonkey Dec 2016 #10
A small portion of his voters was motivated by economics. The supermajority was motivated by bigotry LonePirate Dec 2016 #12
Maybe that's why "primarily economic" was in quotes. HughBeaumont Dec 2016 #13
Yes a BIG spoonful of LIES with a big helping of RACISM...& Tah-Dah... Good to Go! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did "the economic message...»Reply #14