Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,057 posts)
5. The President has no role in preventing gerrymandering.
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 11:21 AM
Dec 2016

District definitions are drawn by each state. There is an oversight by the federal government, but changes require legal action in federal courts. Redistricting after each census is still done by states, with the federal government playing no role until after the districts are defined, except in rare cases where a court has decided that redistricting will be reviewed by a federal system.

The President, however, plays no role in this and has no power to play a role.

If your state has gerrymandered districts, then it's up to the voters in your state to elect new representation that will do the job fairly, as is done in most states. If you need an example, look at Minnesota or Oregon. MN's districting system is subject to state court review after each redistricting. It must follow strict rules and adhere to state law. The citizens of Minnesota have insisted on that.

Each state needs a fair redistricting system, but it's up to the citizens of each state to make sure that is in place.

You can review methods of redistricting and learn more about gerrymandering at the links below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering_in_the_United_States

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is anyone else excited by...»Reply #5