Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The electoral vote today showed why Democrats lose [View all]BainsBane
(57,757 posts)98. You are arguing the problem is that she was Third Way
but that wasn't the problem because she isn't Third Way. Even you couldn't point to a Third Way position she took. Rather, her husband had been Third Way. Moreover, average voters don't think about such things. That is something a segment of the Dem party does. You can't argue that both that the party isn't progressive enough and that policy doesn't matter. The two points are fundamentally incompatible.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There was never a serious electors campaign because no viable alternative was ever promoted.
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#1
Quit looking for zebras when the goddamn horse is standing in front of us all.
Maru Kitteh
Dec 2016
#39
So the Repubs talked the Dems into voting for a compromise candidate, and then the Pubs
Nay
Dec 2016
#90
Without a single viable candidate to receive defected electoral votes, it was not a serious campaign
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#13
This was not an attempt at defection. It was to ensure that if the choice got to the House
Ms. Toad
Dec 2016
#15
Unfortunately that's true at this time, but we need to work on it anyway.
MovingForward2020
Dec 2016
#17
It's been tried before, and hopefully can be tried again at some point (article link included)
MovingForward2020
Dec 2016
#119
It probably wasn't a good idea to make a major part of the campaign an attack on...
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2016
#121
they despise them because they are about inclusiveness. they love the Trumps, Reagan,
JI7
Dec 2016
#27
It's not just a strategic point. A large % of the population recognizes that we are *LYING*.
pablo_marmol
Dec 2016
#22
Not exactly. A lot of gun nuts see the dems as the party of gun control. So even if an
dionysus
Dec 2016
#122
The electoral system has a built in bias to overcome. That isn't 'acting like losers.'
fleabiscuit
Dec 2016
#26
"Hillary Supportes are looking at REALITY." - perhaps, but still not understanding it. n/t
PoliticAverse
Dec 2016
#102
If you think the Democrats are bad that way, you should see the British Labour Party
LeftishBrit
Dec 2016
#53
They were so "unified" that less people voted for Trump than people who voted for Clinton. n/t
PoliticAverse
Dec 2016
#104
We lose because ultimately too many Democrats or progressives care more about getting their way tha
Ohioblue22
Dec 2016
#84
I could have sworn Democrats won the Presidency in 2008. That primary campain...
PoliticAverse
Dec 2016
#105
I agree-I was just pointing out how the selection of electors was done in another state
Gothmog
Dec 2016
#124