Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A note to some people who are finally calling for everyone to join together [View all]hfojvt
(37,573 posts)98. I don't believe WE should have a "canidate selection process"
I think candidates should run, and the voters should decide.
That's kind of how we got Tammy Baldwin and Russ Feingold. I remember both of their primaries (cannot remember who I voted for) I think I left before Baldwin's primary, but before that happened I met her and two or three other candidates, even the Governor candidate in 1998 in the metropolis of Hub City where the Richland County Democrats decided to meet. Not sure if the state party backed a candidate in those primaries, but ultimately it was the primary voters who picked those two candidates.
The same was true this time. Once Russ decided to run himself, probably nobody viable was going to challenge him (and likely lose the primary).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
173 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A note to some people who are finally calling for everyone to join together [View all]
MineralMan
Dec 2016
OP
Yep, I think that actually being a Democrat is a requirement for even being in the discussion
ehrnst
Dec 2016
#125
Don't know what you responded to... but I was an O'Malley supporters who watched as nary a Sanders
KittyWampus
Dec 2016
#91
+1, right now its a trust issue... this election was way important for the pettiness that was shown
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#3
The DNC flagrantly violated it's own rules to favor one candidate. Was that pettiness or just WRONG?
think
Dec 2016
#6
The DNC didn't keep any of the candidates from putting resources into the "southern states" so
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#10
Red herring, it also had nothing to do with primary candidates purposefully skipping "southern
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#62
Strawman, I'm responding to your intimation in your response in this child thread that DWS had
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#74
Not to butt in, but I believe that person was responding directly to your comments.
George II
Dec 2016
#117
OK ... she won by 1 million and that's still a mile... I don't see how that helps the JPR type ...
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#64
I've seen estimates of the caucus states votes, and they were just a fraction of the turnout...
George II
Dec 2016
#116
The DNC allowed a lifelong 'independent' to make a serious run as a "Democrat"?
yallerdawg
Dec 2016
#26
And the DNC didn't hack its own firewall to steal information. One campaign did though
brush
Dec 2016
#43
They sure did,& it will be a cold day in Hell before they let an Independent sucker them again....
Hekate
Dec 2016
#109
The digital fix was only built to guarantee the White House and Senate went GOP.
Ford_Prefect
Dec 2016
#75
I unsubscribed from this *because* of the lack of unity. The OP is spot on. nt
LaydeeBug
Dec 2016
#47
When progressives yelled about those faulty machines in 2000 and 2004, the corporate Dems
yurbud
Dec 2016
#65
As far as unitfying against trump, I agree. However, anyone who willfully refused to
still_one
Dec 2016
#22
I think the current strength of the GOP is an illusion that may well fall apart quickly
Fast Walker 52
Dec 2016
#70
"Stupid" should be the word of the year. "Stupid has conquered all and made our country "stupid"
world wide wally
Dec 2016
#25
Without unity we will have eight years of the orange man, with unity we can limit him to four years
Thinkingabout
Dec 2016
#27
Difficult to count on people who run in the other direction when things don't go exactly their way.
seaglass
Dec 2016
#35
Keith Ellison is terrific. I am also willing to bet he will fail some 'purity test' once he's head
emulatorloo
Dec 2016
#59
Ive been here since 2002. I know exactly what that means. There are people who wear their....
Hekate
Dec 2016
#158
I still see posted here that "Clinton just wasn't *exciting*" or she was "the lesser of two evils".
baldguy
Dec 2016
#36
I read your posts because I think you are a good writer and generally well informed...
Javaman
Dec 2016
#57
to the corporate wing of the Democratic Party, "unity" means leave the driving to us
yurbud
Dec 2016
#61
The whole "Democrats fall in love - Republicans fall in line" has got to stop....
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2016
#99
For the simple reason that people's names are on the ballot, while the Party platform
Hekate
Dec 2016
#159
as much as I tend to agree with this, I think if Trump didn't unify liberals, I don't know what will
Fast Walker 52
Dec 2016
#69
Excellent points, sir. Thank you. Off direction, but what we're seeing now reminds me of.....
George II
Dec 2016
#103
My goodness, SixString, you came all the way out of retirement to dredge that up?
Hekate
Dec 2016
#162