General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A note to some people who are finally calling for everyone to join together [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I do NOT want to rehash the old debate about whether to blame Nader for the Bush administration. I'll simply point to the undeniable numbers. Nader got 2.9 million votes in 2000 -- but in 2004, after four years of Bush, Nader got fewer than half a million.
Here's my interpretation of that stunning falloff: A lot of progressives bought Nader's argument that there wasn't much difference between Bush and Gore, so they thought they had no particular reason to vote for Gore if they didn't strongly support him. Bush showed them the error of their ways.
The people you're talking about this time didn't strongly support Clinton (I didn't either) and felt they had no particular reason to vote for her (which is where they went wrong). My guess is that Trump will be even more effective than Bush the Lesser was at bringing people back into the Democratic tent. I'm more ready to forgive them and welcome them back than you seem to be.