Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If President Obama does not appoint the next Supreme court justice we will have a right winged [View all]beaglelover
(4,449 posts)61. Agree 100%. Bernie or busters and Stein voters are to blame for this result.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If President Obama does not appoint the next Supreme court justice we will have a right winged [View all]
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
OP
This election was stolen. In many ways besides actual votes. If we don't do something to
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#5
Didn't you wonder why there were so many boxes of paper votes that were damaged so they couldn't
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#12
trump is already doing things that are completely unconstitutional and getting away with it!
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#37
And thus, no provision giving the President any authority to do what you want.
WillowTree
Dec 2016
#50
Sadly, I think we are out of luck. Too bad more people weren't focused on this critical aspect
Hoyt
Dec 2016
#2
Why wouldn't President Obama try to use his executive privileges? What the republicans have
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#3
Apparently the majority of voters -- mostly ignorant white wingers -- were fine with GOPers'
Hoyt
Dec 2016
#10
Really? What would they do if he just appointed this man to the court and swore him in?
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#39
No qualified jurist is going to accept a blatantly unconstitutional appointment
onenote
Dec 2016
#58
Okay, let's get serious here for a moment. The President doesn't have the power to "appoint" a
SlimJimmy
Dec 2016
#30
Agree 100%. Bernie or busters and Stein voters are to blame for this result.
beaglelover
Dec 2016
#61
With the number of privileged, self-important voters on "our side", no, it wasn't.
Maven
Dec 2016
#51
It could've been different if Hillary's camp had heeded the warnings and sage advice of Bernie's staff, instead of mocking them.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#78
Predictable as the sun rising in the east... could see this one comin a mile a way.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#83
We sure are, thanks to the Bernie or Busters and the Stein voters. Fuck them all!
beaglelover
Dec 2016
#62
Huh? Most of us voted for Hillary despite many of her anti-Bernie views to avoid the nightmare scenario of Pig-Excrement tRump as President.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#77
The President has the power to appoint judges "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate".
WillowTree
Dec 2016
#9
The republican's advise and consent was to vacate their jobs. Thus it is up to the president
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#13
"The republican's advise and consent was to vacate their jobs". What does that mean?
WillowTree
Dec 2016
#14
Is it possible that this poster believes that the Senate has the duty to consent to any
Yo_Mama
Dec 2016
#24
There were some nonsense articles circulating that made the argument President Obama could declare
tritsofme
Dec 2016
#26
They did not fail to confirm anyone. They did nothing. You cannot say that means consent or denial
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#43
There are consitutional scholars arguing about this now. Do you think your pat answer is the only
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#69
WP - Obama can appoint Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court if the Senate does nothing
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#66
Sure. And the black and white thinking of the rest of you all has allowed the narcissist man child
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#68
Again this is magical thinking. It is not a matter of wanting it hard enough and making it so
tritsofme
Dec 2016
#70
Point well taken... I think a recess appointment is well within bounds. DO IT President Obama!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#79
"Is there anywhere in the conus where it says that they don't have to vote? "
WillowTree
Dec 2016
#56
The president has no executive power to appoint Supreme Court justices barring a recess appt.
Yo_Mama
Dec 2016
#19
No I am not sure. But boy do people feel the need to inform me about the constitution repeatedly
Maraya1969
Dec 2016
#45
The "rules" are that the legislature makes new law, not the executive branch. The executive branch..
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2016
#87
Now your talkin!! Oh, and while he's at it, Obama should just refuse to leave office. (If only!)
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#80
There's a large portion of the population who thinks Trump won the popular vote comfortably.
Drunken Irishman
Dec 2016
#59
I am sick of Democrats surrendering when the KGOPB *doesn't* follow the rules. nt
LaydeeBug
Dec 2016
#54
No qualified jurist who respects the Constitution (something we should want) would accept
onenote
Dec 2016
#57
I am talking about the suppression...the threats...the calls to "monitor" voters
LaydeeBug
Dec 2016
#60
