Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

UTUSN

(77,369 posts)

5. I've been totally puzzled at the piling on on Rachel. I've always had *stylistic* little complaints

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Fri Dec 23, 2016, 05:07 PM

Dec 2016

and from the beginning only tuned in in small doses with long gaps in between, but never because of her politics. This election campaign I tuned in much more often because I needed an antidote to all 17 of the despicable Repukes, then especially because of DRUMPF, and I never saw anything that has merited all the dumping on her.

She was magnificent in confronting and outwitting CONWAY, especially with her RADDATZ ambush, something beauteous to see.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh Man, Ive been giving Rachel a lot [View all] busterbrown Dec 2016 OP

Towards the end, Rachel should have asked if Obama can sue Trump for libel? Or can Raddatz KittyWampus Dec 2016 #1

She was way too nice. kacekwl Dec 2016 #2

Too little, too late. Stinky The Clown Dec 2016 #3

Better than just nodding the head and busterbrown Dec 2016 #4

I've been totally puzzled at the piling on on Rachel. I've always had *stylistic* little complaints UTUSN Dec 2016 #5