Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jaysunb

(11,856 posts)

9. I've long held that Scalia would not rule against

Reply to underpants (Original post)

Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:49 PM

Jun 2012

the mandate based on his "Raich v. Gonzales" opinion....I hope I'm still right, but your comment about the, partisan and out of control of the current court leaves me wondering.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The ruling against SEIU today probably means that the court will rule against Obamacare. [View all] underpants Jun 2012 OP

Unions can still contribute and they can still collect special fees Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #1

Maybe Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2012 #2

If Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #7

I'll keep that in mind. Thanks! Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2012 #11

Does it appear the SCOTUS is preparing for a possible Obama second term? SoutherDem Jun 2012 #3

"Baking into the cake"? Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2012 #4

totally fair ruling by the court. madrchsod Jun 2012 #5

I don't think you read the decision correctly Lurks Often Jun 2012 #6

Except they were "emergency fees" for political activity. jeff47 Jun 2012 #8

I've long held that Scalia would not rule against jaysunb Jun 2012 #9

You doubted...? TeamPooka Jun 2012 #10

It was a 7 - 2 decision. That is not partisan. badtoworse Jun 2012 #12