Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

napi21

(45,806 posts)
Fri Dec 30, 2016, 09:52 PM Dec 2016

Interesting method of prosecution results in police officer sentenced to life in prison. [View all]

http://www.myajc.com/news/metro-atlanta-cop-conviction-breaks-with-national-norm/gJ9FTx6aHdTO4jAVL7FAnJ/

In a year where prosecutions of police officers often failed, the murder conviction and life sentence of East Point Sgt. Marcus Eberhart is a significant exception.

In some ways, the sentencing of a police officer to life in prison reflects the new realities of the post-Ferguson world; and in some ways not. Ever since Michael Brown was fatally shot by police in Ferguson in 2014, the public has been consumed by accounts in which officers kill civilians in the line of duty, especially African Americans. Incidents that would have been local news stories, now rise to national events accompanied at times by protests if not riots.

The East Point incident, however, occurred four months before Ferguson. In April 2014, Eberhart and another officer were accused of using a Taser more than a dozen times on a handcuffed Gregory Lewis Towns Jr. Eberhart was the commanding officer at the scene; the other officer, Cpl. Howard Weems, was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to 18 months.

Advocates say the Eberhart case reflects the effectiveness of a particular strategy in prosecuting police officers, one in which Fulton County and DeKalb County prosecutors are leading the way. Eberhart was charged with felony murder, a charge which means the victim died while the defendant was committing a separate felony.
Consequently, Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard did not have to prove the officer had a specific intent to kill the victim, as required for a murder charge. He only had to prove the officer intended to commit the accompanying felony of aggravated assault.
“It’s an easier bar to clear,” said Dean Dabney, a Georgia State University associate professor of criminal justice and criminology. “With murder you have to prove the intended killing of another with malice and aforethought. It’s a different hurdle to clear with assault.”

This is the first time I've heard of the specific charge of "Felony Murder" but if it's what has to be used to gain justice then I hope it's used in every case from now on. I thought you allk would like to hear about tthis too.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Interesting method of pro...